2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2015.04.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An approach for evaluating the impact of gaps and measurement errors on satellite land surface phenology algorithms: Application to 20year NOAA AVHRR data over Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cong, et al [33] argued that the reason for not finding a single best method could be different definitions of phenology parameters. Kandasamy and Fernandes [34] highlighted that the performance of different smoothing methods depends on both land surface condition and the clear sky identification approach adopted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cong, et al [33] argued that the reason for not finding a single best method could be different definitions of phenology parameters. Kandasamy and Fernandes [34] highlighted that the performance of different smoothing methods depends on both land surface condition and the clear sky identification approach adopted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We adopt the strategy that uses high quality time series to generate validation dataset by artificially creating data gaps [19,20,28]. This is a widely used strategy to quantify the performance of time series reconstruction algorithms.…”
Section: Algorithm Validation and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These algorithms have shown their efficiencies for smoothing time series in diverse ecosystems [17][18][19][20][21][22]. However, they may not perform well for time series with less high-quality observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Satellite time series are usually noisy and discontinuous, which can lead to large uncertainties in the estimation of phenological metrics [21]. To reduce such uncertainties, these data require smoothing and gap-filling before being used in phenological studies.…”
Section: The Savitzky-golay Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different approaches have been identified to derive these metrics in a robust fashion [9][10][11][14][15][16][17][18]. Recent studies have also demonstrated that the uncertainty in the estimation of phenological metrics has a direct relation to the cloud contamination and the quality of satellite data [19][20][21]. However, the quality and research applicability of the Global Inventory Monitoring and Modeling Studies Leaf Area Index third-generation (GIMMS LAI3g) dataset were effectively evaluated and widely used in numerous research studies [22][23][24][25], which indicated that LAI3g data could be effectively used for deriving phenology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%