2015 IEEE International Autumn Meeting on Power, Electronics and Computing (ROPEC) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/ropec.2015.7395123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An approach based on Fourier descriptors and decision trees to perform presumptive diagnosis of esophagitis for educational purposes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Serpa-Andrade et al [44] proposed a method in which the esophagitis (a condition of chronic BE stage) was described using Fourier Transform on the Z-line signature (esophageal irregularities) for classification purposes. The proposed descriptors were based on statical features and textural information.…”
Section: Comparison Among Classifiers For Barrett's Esophagus Recognimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Serpa-Andrade et al [44] proposed a method in which the esophagitis (a condition of chronic BE stage) was described using Fourier Transform on the Z-line signature (esophageal irregularities) for classification purposes. The proposed descriptors were based on statical features and textural information.…”
Section: Comparison Among Classifiers For Barrett's Esophagus Recognimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serpa-Andrade et al [44] k-NN and Random Forests 10 endoscopic images of healthy tissue and 16 images of ill tissue cross-validation proposed a method in which the esophagitis (a condition of cronic BE stage) was described using Fourier Transform on the Z-line signature for classification purposes.…”
Section: -Fold Crossvalidationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different values of the parameters defined in [30] result in the best values of 86.1, 56.8, and 95.3 for accuracy, recall, and specificity criteria, respectively. No evaluation is done for the Z‐line segmentation method in [31], and the results are only reported for the classification. For BE and Polyp segmentation in [32], the best result is achieved in phase II.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, BE and EAC regions are more recognizable than the regions that suffer from early‐stage Barrett (our case) due to their tissue deformation and/or colour changes. Therefore, the methods presented in [28–31, 3336] could not help annotate the Z‐line in our dataset. Along with this reason, the deep learning‐based methods provided in [13, 18, 32] cannot be suitable due to the difference in the quality of the images.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation