1984
DOI: 10.1121/1.2022083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An application of the spheroidal-coordinate-based transition matrix: Acoustic scattering from high aspect ratio solids

Abstract: In a previous paper [R. H. Hackman, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 75, 35–45 (1984)] a spheroidal-coordinate-based transition matrix formalism was established for acoustic and elastic wave scattering. In this paper, we consider the acoustic scattering by a solid elastic cylinder with hemispherical endcaps and a length-to-diameter ratio of 10. Numerical results are presented for the backscattered form function as a function of frequency for various angles of incidence. These results are compared with experimental measurem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These formally exact, numerically solved methods include the perturbation method (Ogilvy, 1991) which is limited to shapes that are close to a separable geometry, the T-matrix method (Waterman, 1968;Varadan et ai., 1982;Lakhtakia et ai., 1984;Hackman and Todoroff, 1985) and solving the boundary integral equation by the boundary element method (Tobocman, 1984;Francis, 1993) These numerical models are limited in that they can be computationally intensive and numerically unstable as the frequency or irregularity of the surface increases.…”
Section: General Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These formally exact, numerically solved methods include the perturbation method (Ogilvy, 1991) which is limited to shapes that are close to a separable geometry, the T-matrix method (Waterman, 1968;Varadan et ai., 1982;Lakhtakia et ai., 1984;Hackman and Todoroff, 1985) and solving the boundary integral equation by the boundary element method (Tobocman, 1984;Francis, 1993) These numerical models are limited in that they can be computationally intensive and numerically unstable as the frequency or irregularity of the surface increases.…”
Section: General Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical solutions have also been developed, including the boundary element method (Tobacman, 1984;Francis, 1993), T-matrix (Waterman, 1968;Varadan et al, 1982;Lakhtakia et al, 1984, Hackman andTodoroff, 1985) and the mode matching methods (Yamashita, 1990) All of these approaches are limited in one or more of the following: frequency range, class of surfaces, types of boundary conditions, eccentricity of shape and/or computational implementation and numerical effciency. DiPerna and Stanton (1994) The FMM proved to be accurate over a wide range of frequencies, shapes of cross section, and penetrable (fluid) as well as impenetrable boundary conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been extensive research done on this classic problem (for example see [1,2,3] ). This section will give a brief overview of Lhe existing methods that deal with the problem stated above, along with their regions of applicability and shortcomings.…”
Section: Revie W Of Relevant Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another numerical technique is the extended boundary condition or T-Matrix method [27,3,28,13,29]. This method assumes an expansion of the surface fields in terms of a complete set of orthogonal functions, and then uses the Helmholtz integral formula to assure that the Helmholtz equation is satisfied .…”
Section: Numerical Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical solutions have also been developed, including the boundary element method (Tobacman, 1984;Francis, 1993), T-matrix (Waterman, 1968;Varadan et aL, 1982;Lakhtakia et aL, 1984;Hackman and Todoroff, 1985) and the mode matching methods (Yamashita, 1990). All of these approaches are limited in one or more of the following: frequency range, class of surfaces, types of boundary conditions, eccentricity of shape and/or computational implementation and numerical efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%