An Application of Mathematical Programming to Assess Productivity in the Houston Independent School District

Abstract

A school may be viewed as an enterprise in which the professional staff provide the operating conditions for converting quantifiable resources or inputs into pupil learning (outputs). The resources are determined by budgets, teacher assignments, and student assignments while learning is determined by various outputs scored according to standardized tests such as the Iowa Test of Basic Skills. Following the work of Charnes, Cooper, and Rhodes (Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, E. Rhodes. 1981. Evaluating program and managerial efficiency: an application of data envelopment analysis to program follow through. Management Sci. 27 (6) 668--697.), we use a ratio definition of efficiency that takes account of all outputs and inputs without requiring a priori specification of weights. Instead a series of mathematical programs are applied to determine "virtual multipliers" from actual data. The multipliers produce values that can be regarded as the "most favorable weights" for each school being evaluated. If the resulting optimum virtual multipliers for a given school yield an efficiency ratio of one, then that school is said to be efficient. If the ratio is less than one then that school is said to be inefficient relative to the other schools in the analysis. The ratio is also accorded operational significance---it is not merely an index number---so that the resulting values and the associated virtual multipliers make it possible to locate where improvements may be made along with their relative magnitudes. This analysis was applied to 167 elementary schools in the Houston Independent School District. Of these schools, 78 were found to be inefficiently utilizing their resources as compared to the 89 efficient schools. Based on this pilot study, an Educational Productivity Council has been formed at the University of Texas at Austin to provide an annual analysis for all of its member schools. At present 285 Texas schools in 22 districts are scheduled for participation in the annual analysis as described in this investigation.mathematical programming: applications, education systems: planning, data envelopment analysis

Inter-national benchmarking of road safety: State of the art

“…Even though there is a strong theoretical foundation for such statistical tools, their primary limitation is in the underlying assumptions of normality, homoscedasticity, and serial independence of regression residuals. Also, Bessent et al (1982) indicate that major difficulties arise when the OLS is used in multiple output cases due to the implicit impact on outputs having the same input resources. In addition, it measures a correlation or central tendency rather than best practice.…”

Robust decomposable Markov decision processes motivated by allocating school budgets

“…However, school assessment need not be through an annual exam and can be through any method that produces a performance measure for schools. Bessent et al (1982) propose one such measure and Borhan and Jemain (2012) propose another, this is not an exhaustive list of all school assessment methods. Bessent et al (1982) view a school as an enterprise in which the professional staff provide the operating conditions for converting quantifiable resources or inputs into pupil learning outputs.…”

“…Bessent et al (1982) propose one such measure and Borhan and Jemain (2012) propose another, this is not an exhaustive list of all school assessment methods. Bessent et al (1982) view a school as an enterprise in which the professional staff provide the operating conditions for converting quantifiable resources or inputs into pupil learning outputs. The resources are determined by budgets, teacher assignments, and student assignments; learning outputs are determined by pupil performance on standardized tests.…”

A comparison of public and private schools in Spain using robust nonparametric frontier methods

“…Among these models, the nonparametric approach has been the most frequently option in the educational context, due to its ability to handle multiple intermediate outputs and its flexibility, which makes it particularly suitable in an area where the production technology is difficult to define (Mancebón and Bandrés 1999). This approach has been mainly applied to estimate efficiency measures using data at school or school district level (Bessent and Bessent 1980;Bessent et al 1982;Thanassoulis and Dunstan 1994;Mancebon and Molinero 2000;Grosskopf and Moutray 2001;Banker et al 2004). In our case we are interested in working with student level data, since this possibility implies some significant advantages for interpreting the results obtained in the analysis and disentangling the effect of multiple factors affecting the performance of students (Summers and Wolf, 1977;Hanushek, 1996;Waldo, 2007).…”