1978
DOI: 10.2307/3151255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Application of Equity Theory to Buyer-Seller Exchange Situations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
113
0
14

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 243 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
113
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Huppertz, Arenson and Evans (1978) define fair prices as involving an "equitable distribution of the benefits" from the exchange between consumers and firms. This is similar in spirit to the preferences considered in Fehr and Schmidt (1999) and Bolton and Ockenfels (2000) where individuals have preferences for relatively equal outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Huppertz, Arenson and Evans (1978) define fair prices as involving an "equitable distribution of the benefits" from the exchange between consumers and firms. This is similar in spirit to the preferences considered in Fehr and Schmidt (1999) and Bolton and Ockenfels (2000) where individuals have preferences for relatively equal outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equity theory suggests that individuals in exchange relationships compare the ratios of their inputs into the exchange to their outcomes from the exchange (Huppertz, Arenson and Evans, 1978). While the input describes the contribution individuals should make within the exchange to earn rewards, the outcome refers to expected positive and negative consequences of the exchange.…”
Section: Anm Model and Equity Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an exchange relationship, distributive justice is achieved when the benefits of each partner are proportional to their investments (Fischer, Diamantopoulos and Oldenkotte, 2012). Inequity occurs when the inputs and/or outcomes in an exchange are perceived to be inconsistent with the inputs and/or outcomes of the referent (Huppertz et al, 1978).…”
Section: Anm Model and Equity Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also assume the presence of relative justice in the exchange process (Huppertz, Arenson & Evans, 1978) such that the absence of relative justice in value distribution can produce negative sentiments and behavioural responses (eg., dissatisfaction and withdrawal of contributions towards value creation). However, relative justice in economic rewards to stakeholders is subjective and varies from one company to another hence, the need to examine whether corporate bodies, in modern times, control their behaviours and whether they are responding to employees' interests in an effective way.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%