1978
DOI: 10.1177/002224377801500208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Application of Equity Theory to Buyer-Seller Exchange Situations

Abstract: Equity theory was applied to retail exchange situations to test hypotheses about subjects’ perceptions of inequity and behaviors they would perform. Subjects in Group 1 made evaluative ratings of 16 hypothetical situations in which two sources of inequity, high price and poor service, were introduced, along with varying levels of shopping frequency and item cost. Subjects perceived high price inequity situations as less fair than low ones, and high service inequity situations as less fair than low ones when pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
142
1
6

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
142
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Also the equity perception was checked by a 5-point scale comprising the equity items of Lapidus and Pinkerton (1995) and Huppertz et al (1978) (see Appendix D), adapted to the situation (Cronbach's Alpha ¼ 0.91). In the first division the relationship was perceived to be inequitable to neutral, whereas in the second department the relationship was found to be equitable (n ¼ 30,…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Also the equity perception was checked by a 5-point scale comprising the equity items of Lapidus and Pinkerton (1995) and Huppertz et al (1978) (see Appendix D), adapted to the situation (Cronbach's Alpha ¼ 0.91). In the first division the relationship was perceived to be inequitable to neutral, whereas in the second department the relationship was found to be equitable (n ¼ 30,…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the first ratio is larger than the second ratio, the consumer is overbenefited, i.e., there is positive inequity (Adams, 1965). In other words, consumerÀretailer relationships in which the consumer feels he or she is being treated unfairly can be interpreted as negatively inequitable (Huppertz et al, 1978). This perception of inequity leads the consumer to feel underrewarded and entails feelings of anger and resentment (Ganesan, 1994;Lapidus and Pinkerton, 1995).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to reciprocal theory, "relationship investment emphasizes an aim for reciprocation by consumers that is based on retention efforts made by a retailer" (Huppertz, Arenson, and Evans, 1978).…”
Section: The Influence Of Dedication-based Relationship Maintenance Omentioning
confidence: 99%