2006
DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/17/12/005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An application of digital image processing techniques to the characterization of liquid petroleum gas (LPG) spray

Abstract: To control fuel injection, optimize combustion and reduce emissions for LPG (liquefied petroleum gas) engines, it is necessary and important to understand the characteristics of LPG sprays. The present work investigates the geometry of LPG sprays, including spray tip penetration, spray angle, projected spray area and spray volume, by using schlieren photography and digital image processing techniques. Two types of single nozzle injectors were studied, with the same nozzle diameter, but one with and one without… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that the results from the manual and proposed automated method are very close. The maximum difference data of the tip penetrations, and near-field and far-field angles are 2.70% (figure 13(a)), 3.51% (figure 13(b)) and 4.06% (figure 13(c)), respectively, and are more consistent than the comparison results under atmospheric temperature in [24,37]. Further, figure 14 compares the tip penetration results for the program method and Hiroyasu model [20] predictions, and shows that both results are in good agreement.…”
Section: Verification Of the Image Processing Methodology And Repeata...supporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This means that the results from the manual and proposed automated method are very close. The maximum difference data of the tip penetrations, and near-field and far-field angles are 2.70% (figure 13(a)), 3.51% (figure 13(b)) and 4.06% (figure 13(c)), respectively, and are more consistent than the comparison results under atmospheric temperature in [24,37]. Further, figure 14 compares the tip penetration results for the program method and Hiroyasu model [20] predictions, and shows that both results are in good agreement.…”
Section: Verification Of the Image Processing Methodology And Repeata...supporting
confidence: 69%
“…Based on the capability of the test apparatus and the necessity for studies of evaporation characteristics, the macroscopic characteristics investigated in this paper include: tip penetration, near-field angle, far-field angle, projected spray area and spray volume. Considering the definitions of these parameters as given in [14,[37][38][39][40], the following sections present the definitions of the characteristics and the calculation method used in this paper.…”
Section: Definitions Of the Spray Macroscopic Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant insight into spatial and temporal features of ignition and combustion processes have been gained by imaging in constant volume chambers (e.g. [9,[12][13][14]), rapid compression/expansion machines (RCEMs, e.g. [11,15]), and optically-accessible engines (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For COI analysis of in-cylinder imaging data, the general approach is to segment each raw image into a binary image containing only the region of interest to be measured (e.g. fuel-jet spread angle and penetration [14,27] or reaction zone lift-off length [19,28]), evaluate the metric of interest, and then evaluate the mean value for the metric of interest. This approach has generally been limited to SI applications (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of measurement methods have been used to study fuel spray behavior, including Mie scattering, schlieren photography, laser-induced exciplex fluorescence (LIEF) and x-ray radiography. Mie scattering and schlieren photography are widely used to measure the liquid and vapor penetration lengths of a fuel spray, respectively [9][10][11][12]. Although schlieren photography captures both the liquid and vapor phases of a fuel spray, it is difficult to distinguish between them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%