1953
DOI: 10.1007/bf02289028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An application of confidence intervals and of maximum likelihood to the estimation of an examinee's ability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
2

Year Published

1954
1954
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…With respect to the former, the release of Gulliksen's (1950) Theory of Mental Tests deserves special mention for its codification of classical test theory. But more forward looking was work to create a statistically grounded foundation for the analysis of test scores, a latent-trait theory (Lord 1952(Lord , 1953. This direction would later lead to the groundbreaking development of item response theory (IRT; Lord and Novick 1968), which became a well-established part of applied statistical research in domains well beyond education and is now an important building block of generalized modeling frameworks, which connect the item response functions of IRT with structural models (Carlson and von Davier, Chap.…”
Section: Psychometric and Statistical Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to the former, the release of Gulliksen's (1950) Theory of Mental Tests deserves special mention for its codification of classical test theory. But more forward looking was work to create a statistically grounded foundation for the analysis of test scores, a latent-trait theory (Lord 1952(Lord , 1953. This direction would later lead to the groundbreaking development of item response theory (IRT; Lord and Novick 1968), which became a well-established part of applied statistical research in domains well beyond education and is now an important building block of generalized modeling frameworks, which connect the item response functions of IRT with structural models (Carlson and von Davier, Chap.…”
Section: Psychometric and Statistical Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more detailed, practical discussion of these item parameters is gilien in Lord (1970b Lord (1952Lord ( , 1970aLord ( , 1972); Samejima (1962, 1966). Their findings support the model for the data studied.…”
Section: The Guttman Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods for estimating the item parameters have been developed and tried out by Lord (1952Lord ( , 1968Lord ( , 1972, Samejima (1962, 1966), Birnbaum (1968), Bock (1970Bock ( , 1972, Bock and Lieberman (1970), Kolakowski and Bock (1970), Kolakowski (1969Kolakowski ( , 1972, Lees, Wingersky, and Lord (1972). Studies making theoretical or practical use of these models appear in two books by Solomon (1961Solomon ( , 1965.…”
Section: The Guttman Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among various estimators of ability, the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE; Lord, 1953) has been a basic one. The maximum a posteriori or Bayes modal estimator (BME; Samejima, 1969, Chapter 2;Bock & Aitkin, 1981) is also familiar, where the standard normal prior is typically used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%