An application‐based classification to understand buyer‐supplier interaction in business services

Abstract

Purpose -Most existing classifications of business services have taken the perspective of the supplier as opposed to that of the buyer. To address this imbalance, the purpose of this paper is to propose a classification of business services based on how the buying company applies the service with respect to its own business processes. Design/methodology/approach -The paper considers some specific aspects of the process of buying and exchanging business services, focusing on the everyday production and consumption of services as opposed to the initial purchasing and negotiation phases. Findings -Earlier literature has developed similar, albeit less elaborate classifications, but does not provide detailed insight into how such classifications are related to differentiated buyer-supplier interaction. This classification distinguishes between four business service applications; as a component, semi-manufacture, instrument or consumable. For each of these four types of services, interaction has to achieve different objectives and consequently they differ with regards to required organizational resources in terms of required capabilities and buyer-supplier interfaces. Research limitations/implications -Primarily conceptual and exploratory in nature, this paper is intended as a review of existing literature and possible starting point for further empirical validation and theoretical refinement. The paper contends that the differences in application have a significant impact on interaction patterns, but this is not to say that other variables have no impact on buyer-supplier interaction patterns. Subsequent research should seek to control for those other possible sources of variation. Practical implications -The overall implication of this classification is that for different services, the buying company should assess how they are applied. Subsequently, it is relevant for firms to consider what functional aspects are crucial and who are likely to become, or who should be involved and to what extent, in the purchasing decision process and in the interactions that take place after the decision has been made.

Relationship Development in Business Triads—Case Studies in Corporate Travel Management

“…Wynstra et al 2006). even though corporate travel is a company specific function, the results of this study may be used to evaluate the core relationships in corporate travel management in organizations with large travel budgets.…”

The need for customizing maintenance services in social housing

“…Nevertheless, Parasuraman argues that customer-seller links differ for services that are used internally and services that will be sold to customers in the next level in the supply chain (whether or not they have been modified). In such supply chains, the quality of the service provision strongly influences endcustomer satisfaction, which implies a need for wellmapped customer requirements (Ahlstrom and Nordin, 2006;Wynstra et al, 2006). Most often, built asset maintenance is viewed as a cost burden by organizations (Sherwin, 2000;Tsang, 2002).…”

Translating satisfaction determination from health care to the automotive industry

“…It is the total workflow that defines customers' perception about the quality of service encounters and thus their satisfaction (Wynstra et al 2006). A well-established customer interaction strategy has been identified as fundamentally important (Lindgreen et al 2006).…”