2010
DOI: 10.1617/s11527-010-9621-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An applicability of dynamic response analysis of shear-failure type RC beams with lightweight aggregate concrete under falling-weight impact loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many factors affecting the behavior of RC members under impact loading such as the dimensions and span of members, cross-section properties (steel ratio, stirrups, concrete cover), material properties (concrete, steel, FRP) and stiffness of the impact surface, (Bhatti et al 2009(Bhatti et al , 2011Fujikake et al 2009;Ho 2004;Kishi and Mikami 2002;Kishi et al 2002Kishi et al , 2006Saatci and Vecchio 2009;Remennikov and Kaewunruen 2006). The only testing parameter in this experimental study was the strengthening effect.…”
Section: Test Specimensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many factors affecting the behavior of RC members under impact loading such as the dimensions and span of members, cross-section properties (steel ratio, stirrups, concrete cover), material properties (concrete, steel, FRP) and stiffness of the impact surface, (Bhatti et al 2009(Bhatti et al , 2011Fujikake et al 2009;Ho 2004;Kishi and Mikami 2002;Kishi et al 2002Kishi et al , 2006Saatci and Vecchio 2009;Remennikov and Kaewunruen 2006). The only testing parameter in this experimental study was the strengthening effect.…”
Section: Test Specimensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the tension region, linear model was applied, but it was assumed that the stress cannot be transferred when a tensile pressure acted in the element reaches the breaking point. Here, the pressure is evaluated as an average of three normal stresses acted in each element and the tensile strength of concrete was assumed to be one-tenth of compressive strength similarly to the case of the numerical analysis for small-scale RC beams (Bhatti et al 2009(Bhatti et al , 2010. However, the effect of fracture energy of concrete on mesh size in the tension softening range has not been considered in this study.…”
Section: Modelling Of Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One-quarter model of the real girder with sand cushion is given, considering symmetry with respect to the two axes in the span and width directions. Element types used in this model are as follows: beam element for axial rebar and stirrup which are of equivalent flexural stiffness, cross-sectional areas, and unit mass with those of real bars; and 8-node solid element for all Impact Response Analysis of Prototype RC Girders the other elements (Bhatti et al, 2009(Bhatti et al, , 2011. Figure 6(b) shows finite element (FE) model for axial rebar and stirrup arranged in the RC girder.…”
Section: Overview Of Numerical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was assumed that (1) yield stress is equal to compressive strength f 0 c ; (2) concrete yields at 1500 mm strains; (3) the tensile stress is perfectly released when an applied pressure reaches tensile strength of concrete; (4) tensile strength of concrete is assumed to be one-tenth of compressive strength for the control mesh size in the span direction; and (5) yielding of concrete was judged based on the DruckerPrager's yield criterion (Bhatti et al, 2011).…”
Section: Concretementioning
confidence: 99%