1968
DOI: 10.1016/0003-9969(68)90034-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An apparatus for frequency-controlled feeding of small rodents and its use in dental caries experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
62
0
1

Year Published

1968
1968
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
62
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The same situation is found in certain populations in China (Afonsky, 1951 Bibby, 1990 (2) 000) with programmed feeding (the Kbnig-Hoffer apparatus; Kbnig et al, 1968;Grenby and Mistry, 1995). The method of Bowen et al (1980) (Bowen et al, 1980).…”
Section: Studies Of the Starch-caries Issue With Humansmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The same situation is found in certain populations in China (Afonsky, 1951 Bibby, 1990 (2) 000) with programmed feeding (the Kbnig-Hoffer apparatus; Kbnig et al, 1968;Grenby and Mistry, 1995). The method of Bowen et al (1980) (Bowen et al, 1980).…”
Section: Studies Of the Starch-caries Issue With Humansmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…König 99 showed that dental caries experience increases with increasing frequency of intake of sugars even when the absolute intake of sugars eaten by all groups of rats was the same. Firestone 100 showed that less caries developed as the interval between feeds was increased.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the 1940s, the principal concern among dental professionals has been the high worldwide prevalence of dental caries. Results from several controlled human studies [1][2][3][4][5] , a study on patients with hereditary fructose intolerance 6 and laboratory investigations [7][8][9][10][11] carried out over the past 50 years have shown that sucrose plays a major role in the initiation and progression of dental caries. Thus, the Turku Sugar Studies fired the search for non-cariogenic sucrose substitutes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%