2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An APOS study on pre-service teachers’ understanding of injections and surjections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…APOS studies have been conducted on pre-service high school Mathematics teachers' understanding of various concepts, but none on primary school teachers' knowledge (e.g. Bansilal, Brijlall & Trigueros 2017;Ndlovu & Brijlall 2015). In this article we will consider pre-service teachers' misconceptions that permeate from addition and subtraction of fractions using APOS theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…APOS studies have been conducted on pre-service high school Mathematics teachers' understanding of various concepts, but none on primary school teachers' knowledge (e.g. Bansilal, Brijlall & Trigueros 2017;Ndlovu & Brijlall 2015). In this article we will consider pre-service teachers' misconceptions that permeate from addition and subtraction of fractions using APOS theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other research focuses on specific aspects of the function concept and not on functions in general. Bansilal, Brijlall and Trigueros (2017) explored pre-service teachers' understanding of injections and surjections through an APOS study. They found that most participants were at the action level.…”
Section: Conceptual Difficulties Of the Function Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, research demonstrates that pre-service teachers have difficulties in understanding and constructing proofs (Bansilal et al, 2017;Baştürk, 2010;Zeybek, 2015). These results suggest that teacher preparation programs should pay a careful attention to the proof understandings of pre-service mathematics teachers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%