2002
DOI: 10.1029/2000jc000439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An annual cycle of Arctic surface cloud forcing at SHEBA

Abstract: [1] We present an analysis of surface fluxes and cloud forcing from data obtained during the Surface Heat Budget of the Arctic Ocean (SHEBA) experiment, conducted in the Beaufort and Chuchki Seas and the Arctic Ocean from November 1997 to October 1998. The measurements used as part of this study include fluxes from optical radiometer sets, turbulent fluxes from an instrumented tower, cloud fraction from a depolarization lidar and ceilometer, and atmospheric temperature and humidity profiles from radiosondes. C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

30
376
2
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 370 publications
(409 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
30
376
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As the cloud radiative forcing in the central Arctic is negative only for a few weeks in midsummer [Intrieri et al, 2002], the results are in accordance with the observed increase in the length of the melting season.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…As the cloud radiative forcing in the central Arctic is negative only for a few weeks in midsummer [Intrieri et al, 2002], the results are in accordance with the observed increase in the length of the melting season.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Curry and Ebert (1992), Schweiger and Key (1994), Zhang et al (1996), and Walsh and Chapman (1998) all have shown that the net effect of polar clouds is to warm the surface during all but short durations of the high-sun season. Intrieri et al (2002b) and Persson et al (2002) confirmed these results during the SHEBA experiment. Their analyses of the annual cycle of surface turbulent heat fluxes during the SHEBA experiment likewise confirmed that, in general, surface turbulent heat fluxes acted to warm the surface during clear periods, but were small during cloudy periods.…”
Section: Surface Heat Budgetssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This match indicates that at least on the monthly timescales considered here, there is no evidence to resolve the question of whether the pronounced autumn sea ice and cloudiness anomalies during RILEs are triggered by the ice or the clouds. This result suggests that the very rapid response of surface radiative fluxes to changes in cloudiness in the Arctic (Intrieri et al 2002) necessitates that lead-lag correlations be calculated at higher temporal resolution, but unfortunately daily output from these simulations was not available. We also acknowledge that other sea ice variables such as freeze-up date and growth rates might be more sensitive to the warming influence of increased autumn cloudiness, but we retain ice concentration as our comparative metric due to its close physical linkage with surface evaporation and therefore cloud formation.…”
Section: Role Of Clouds: Driver or Responder?mentioning
confidence: 98%