2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.10.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An anisotropic, hyperelastic model for skin: Experimental measurements, finite element modelling and identification of parameters for human and murine skin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
128
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
128
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Wu et al (2006) reported a tensile Young's modulus of 3 MPa at 100% relative humidity (RH) to 370 MPa at 30% RH. Although some authors have developed computational models of the skin (Groves et al, 2013;Limbert, 2011;Ní Annaidh et al, 2012) or the dermis (Flynn andMcCormack, 2009, 2010) which account for the anisotropic properties induced by the presence of collagen fibres, this approach is not followed in the current research for two main reasons. The first reason is motivated by the decision to keep the model as simple as possible to facilitate the interpretation of results and to focus on structural rather than material effects.…”
Section: Mechanical Properties Of Skinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wu et al (2006) reported a tensile Young's modulus of 3 MPa at 100% relative humidity (RH) to 370 MPa at 30% RH. Although some authors have developed computational models of the skin (Groves et al, 2013;Limbert, 2011;Ní Annaidh et al, 2012) or the dermis (Flynn andMcCormack, 2009, 2010) which account for the anisotropic properties induced by the presence of collagen fibres, this approach is not followed in the current research for two main reasons. The first reason is motivated by the decision to keep the model as simple as possible to facilitate the interpretation of results and to focus on structural rather than material effects.…”
Section: Mechanical Properties Of Skinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is interesting to note that despite of the micromechanical motivation and structure of these models, the constitutive equations for the components are usually phenomenological (for example Fung-type for fibers and Neokookean for matrix) and the paramaters of these constitutive models are typically obtained from a fit of the measured experimental behavior on the composite as a whole [6,11,31,32], frequently even using inverse analysis over continuum finite element structures [31,32]; although recently more efforts are placed on using the specific histological data to obtain at least some material parameters. The structure-based approach would suggest to employ just parameters from experimental data of the components and from histological data, avoiding phenomenological, macroscopic fitting of any microstructural material parameter, specially when multiple solutions are possible and frequently reported, see for example [31,32,33]. Furthermore, the computationally efficient General Structure Tensor schemes used in finite element simulations of organs compute continuum stresses from average (and affine) strains of components in a nonlinear problem, which is another approximation which reduces their accuracy [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, number of models have been used to describe the strain rate sensitivity of the material, such as Ogden 12-14 and other approaches. 15, 16 Shergold et al…”
Section: Analytical Modelling Of Skin and Polymersmentioning
confidence: 99%