We thank the readers for showing interest and commenting on our article.From the last paragraph of the letter it seems that the impression gained from the article is that we advocate the use of the hand held lactate meter as a replacement of the arterial blood gas (ABG) machine. This is incorrect as we have compared the results obtained from both the machines in an effort to validate the results obtained from the hand held machine.Providing an ABG machine in all field settings may not be economically feasible, moreover, even provision of the basic support systems for the ABG machines (which do require extensive service and engineering back up) may not be possible everywhere. It is in these settings where the hand held lactate meter would provide invaluable inputs for resuscitation and follow up of patients suffering from the sepsis syndrome. We therefore in fact do not consider it as a limitation of the study. Moreover, we would also not agree that 'field settings are resource limited'. Compared to any other health care organization in the country, AFMS field hospitals are very well equipped with pulse oximeters, transport ventilators, infusion pumps, etc. provided from various sources. Therefore, provisioning of handheld lactate meters at the periphery is very much possible and economical.