2019 Novel Intelligent and Leading Emerging Sciences Conference (NILES) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/niles.2019.8909289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An ANFIS-based Human Activity Recognition using IMU sensor Fusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each IMU sensor consists of one accelerometer sensor and one gyroscope sensor. Based on the existing research works [ 3 , 25 , 26 ], we used only 3-axis gyroscope signals of each IMU sensor for monitoring the movement of teres and latissimus muscles while the EMG signals to monitor the movement of bicep muscles. The two gyroscope sensors are located between the upper back shoulder blades and the middle back lumbar support of the smart fitness suite, as displayed in Figure 4 .…”
Section: Proposed Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each IMU sensor consists of one accelerometer sensor and one gyroscope sensor. Based on the existing research works [ 3 , 25 , 26 ], we used only 3-axis gyroscope signals of each IMU sensor for monitoring the movement of teres and latissimus muscles while the EMG signals to monitor the movement of bicep muscles. The two gyroscope sensors are located between the upper back shoulder blades and the middle back lumbar support of the smart fitness suite, as displayed in Figure 4 .…”
Section: Proposed Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HAR system developed by the authors [ 40 , 41 , 42 ] shows that due to its limited ability to capture information, a single IMU can only recognize continuous actions and cannot identify actions containing switching processes, despite the good feature processing and classification methods used. The authors in [ 40 ] classify the body actions into four categories, considering continuous actions with a classification accuracy 98.88%. However, the transition process (i.e., from the current action to the new action) is not considered.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it refrains from specifically addressing GPS-IMU incorporation, it offers details on the application of ANFIS for IMU data error estimation, and the outcome implies that the ANFIS could substantially enhance the accuracy of inertial navigation positioning, which is important for vehicle inertial navigation in intricate and covert settings [25]. Research by [26] presents an ANFIS-based approach to categorizing everyday life events using data collected by IMU sensors. Although it concentrates on identifying activities rather than GPS-IMU data correction, it still exhibits the usage of ANFIS in sensor fusion with a total accuracy of 98.88%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%