2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41556-021-00743-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An androgen receptor switch underlies lineage infidelity in treatment-resistant prostate cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
79
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
6
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have shown that basal CD44 Lo cancer cells spontaneously convert to a CD44 Hi cancer stem cell state in vitro and in vivo , in a ZEB1-dependent manner 14 . Consistent with further studies demonstrating that chemotherapy drives phenotypic plasticity 16, 36 , we show that all standard chemotherapies used to treat TNBC (Doxorubicin, Cisplatin and Docetaxel) drive CD44 Lo to CD44 Hi cell state transitions in a dose dependent manner (Fig. 3A; Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…We have shown that basal CD44 Lo cancer cells spontaneously convert to a CD44 Hi cancer stem cell state in vitro and in vivo , in a ZEB1-dependent manner 14 . Consistent with further studies demonstrating that chemotherapy drives phenotypic plasticity 16, 36 , we show that all standard chemotherapies used to treat TNBC (Doxorubicin, Cisplatin and Docetaxel) drive CD44 Lo to CD44 Hi cell state transitions in a dose dependent manner (Fig. 3A; Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Although EZH2 has been shown to regulate a transcriptional program driving a lineage-switch away from differentiated adenocarcinoma in RB1 -/- , TP53 -/- models (Davies et al, 2021; Ping Mu et al, 2017; Sheng Yu Ku et al, 2017), we observed only an insignificant increase in AR-positivity in both PC35-1 and PC35-2 in the EZH2i condition (Figure S7C), and we did not see upregulation of EZH2 or phosho-EZH2 upon enzalutamide treatment (Figure S7D), suggesting context-dependence for EZH2-driven mechanisms observed in RB1/TP53 loss models. Together these results indicate that the stem-like/progenitor subpopulation can be directly targeted by AURKAi to block growth and imply the existence of a residual AR POS proliferative population with potential sensitivity to AR inhibition.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diversified and labile transcriptional programs within a heterogenous tumor cell population can rapidly confer clonal fitness in the face of therapeutic pressure (Bolis et al, 2021; Davies et al, 2021; Fennell et al, 2021; Taavitsainen et al, 2021). In our models clonally-determined lineage distributions were partially explained by pre-existing genomic alterations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once bound to DNA, the AR recruits chromatin-modifying enzymes that stabilize accessibility and provide a platform for coregulators and TFs [ 91 ]. This includes histone methyltransferases such as EZH2 [ 92 , 93 , 94 ], SET9 [ 95 ], and MLL complex (MLL, MLL4, WDR5, ASH2L) [ 96 ]; histone acetyltransferases (HAT) such as p160, SRC-1, TIF2/GRIP1-1, ACTR/AIB1/RAC3/pCIP [ 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 ], CBP [ 102 ], p300 [ 103 ], and pCAF [ 104 ]; and histone deacetylases (HDAC) such as HDAC1-3 (class I), HDAC4-10 (class II), and SIRT1-7 (class III) and HDAC11 (class IV) [ 105 ]. Characterization of the AREIII enhancer demonstrated the sequential recruitment of p160 and p300, was then followed by CBP and pCAF [ 21 ].…”
Section: Impact Of Chromatin Modifying Enzymes On Ar Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%