2018
DOI: 10.4993/acrt.26.39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An ancillary biomarker study in the SAMIT randomized trial: Sequential paclitaxel followed by UFT or S-1 versus UFT or S-1 alone as adjuvant chemotherapy for T4a/b gastric cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pre-de ned statistical analysis plan for this study has been reported previously 40 . The primary and secondary endpoints were the OS and DFS, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The pre-de ned statistical analysis plan for this study has been reported previously 40 . The primary and secondary endpoints were the OS and DFS, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mRNA expression level of each gene was classi ed as low versus high using the median mRNA expression level as a cut-off point, as described previously 40 . If the mRNA expression level of a particular gene was below 1.0×10 -8 ng/μL, the expression level was set to '0.00'.…”
Section: De Ning the Predictive Value Of The Biomarkersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We adopted an internal validation strategy, as proposed by Wahl et al 47 , to address the potential overestimation of the standard error owing to multiple imputations and optimism in the predictive performance. We used Harrell’s C statistics to analyze the predictive performance of the survival data and addressed the optimistic bias by Harrell’s C statistics using the bootstrap 0.632 + method with 20 bootstrap samples from the original dataset with replacement, followed by multiple imputations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%