1987
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5193(87)80199-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An anatomical model to determine step height in step testing for estimating aerobic capacity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Three readings were taken for each variable and the average of the second and third measures were used in the analysis. The same three variables were assessed 15 seconds after completion of a step test in which subjects maintained vigorous exercise for 3 minutes (Culpepper and Francis 1987). These physical 'stress' blood pressures and heart rates were measured automatically with an oscillometric device (Dinamap 18465X).…”
Section: Dependent Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three readings were taken for each variable and the average of the second and third measures were used in the analysis. The same three variables were assessed 15 seconds after completion of a step test in which subjects maintained vigorous exercise for 3 minutes (Culpepper and Francis 1987). These physical 'stress' blood pressures and heart rates were measured automatically with an oscillometric device (Dinamap 18465X).…”
Section: Dependent Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proper corrections of step height and hip angle can accommodate a subject to perform a step test more conveniently and that provides a better estimation of aerobic capacity (Culpepper and Francis 1987). But, the practical problem of such corrections is that it is Values are presented as mean + standard deviation NS = Not signifi cant to be adjusted in case of each and every individual who is performing the test and that deviates from the standard norm of a testing protocol.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HST was designed on the Western population whose stature and knee height are generally higher than those of the populations of Eastern countries like India. Culpepper and Francis (1987) reported that accommodation of step height to the subject's statute height is needed for the better estimation of aerobic capacity, but such adjustment procedure needs complicated modifi cations for each subject with respect to the individual's body height, knee height and hip angle. Moreover, Ashley, et al, (1997) reported that step tests based on subjects' stature do not more accurately predict the aerobic capacity than those using a standardized bench height.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When using the original version of the Harvard (Brouha, 1943) test, various authors have expressed concern about choice of an appropriate step height, even in adults (Culpepper and Francis, 1987;Datta etal, 1974;Francis and Brasher, 1992;Tuxworth and Shahnawaz, 1977). However, the subject's score on the standard CHFT is independent of leg length over a wide range, from 0.75 to 1.01 m (Thomas etal, 1993) or 30 to 50% of leg length (Cicutti et al, 1991).…”
Section: Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%