2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2014.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analytical tuning approach to multivariable model predictive controllers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, it is shown that for the FOPDT models control horizon of two provides the maximum achievable performance. The proposed method in [10] is extended for unstable plants with fractional dead time and multivariable plants in [11] and [12] respectively. Some efforts have been done in on-line tuning like gradient decrement, fuzzy logic and on-line optimization algorithms.…”
Section: Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, it is shown that for the FOPDT models control horizon of two provides the maximum achievable performance. The proposed method in [10] is extended for unstable plants with fractional dead time and multivariable plants in [11] and [12] respectively. Some efforts have been done in on-line tuning like gradient decrement, fuzzy logic and on-line optimization algorithms.…”
Section: Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the complex relationships between these tuneable parameters and the closed loop system properties, many previous authors have suggested 'tuning rules' that allow a user to configure an MPC instance to achieve a desired level of closed-loop performance [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. This paper is concerned with the selection of the move suppression coefficient, which serves a dual purpose of conditioning the system matrix before its inversion and suppressing aggressive control actions [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper is concerned with the selection of the move suppression coefficient, which serves a dual purpose of conditioning the system matrix before its inversion and suppressing aggressive control actions [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. This non-negative dimensionless parameter is known to have a significant impact upon performance and robustness [4][5][6][7][8], and in practice proves difficult to tune empirically (even for experienced control engineers) as recent work has highlighted [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering First Order plus Dead Time (FOPDT) model of real system, closed loop transfer function is derived and it is shown that maximum achievable performance can be obtained by control horizon of one. Also, this approach is extended to unstable plants with fractional delay in [7] and multivariable plants in [8]. However, these methods are not appropriate for unknown or time varying plants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%