2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analytical solution for predicting the transient seepage from a subsurface drainage system

Abstract: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. Highlights  An analytical solution is derived for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They present results from experiments in a sand flume and report a water release of 12% of the volume between the initial and final water table. Using this value of 0.12 as storage coefficient in a 1-dimensional calculation based on the Dupuit Forchheimer assumption gives a result (figure below) which is very similar to the outcome of the analytical solution presented by Xin et al (2016) in their Figure 5a.…”
supporting
confidence: 71%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…They present results from experiments in a sand flume and report a water release of 12% of the volume between the initial and final water table. Using this value of 0.12 as storage coefficient in a 1-dimensional calculation based on the Dupuit Forchheimer assumption gives a result (figure below) which is very similar to the outcome of the analytical solution presented by Xin et al (2016) in their Figure 5a.…”
supporting
confidence: 71%
“…Note: Figure 5a of Xin et al (2016) shows the initial groundwater table erroneously at 0.4 m instead of the correct value of 0.45 m.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Compared with the period of design, construction and operation of underground caverns, the excavation period is short but important, and excavation disasters caused by groundwater seepage are common [8,[21][22][23]. During excavation, the potential seepage boundary is formed immediately on the wall of the caverns and drainage system, but the descent of groundwater is a hysteretic result of the water retention capability of soil and rock mass [12,24,25]. Thus, the flow rate, hydraulic gradient and hydraulic pressure of caverns change dynamically [25,26], and these changes are influenced by the relation between the saturation and matric suction of soil and rock mass.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%