2004
DOI: 10.2118/88996-pa
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Analytical Scaling Method for Spontaneous Imbibition in Gas/Water/Rock Systems

Abstract: A method was developed to scale the experimental data of spontaneous water imbibition (cocurrent) for gas/water/rock systems. In this method, a dimensionless time was defined with the effects of relative permeability, wettability, and gravity included. The definition was not empirical but based on a theoretical derivation. Using this dimensionless time, experimental data from spontaneous water imbibition in different rocks with different size, porosity, permeability, initial water saturation, interfacial tensi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

9
68
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
9
68
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the results of Kewen Li and Roland N. Horne, the irreducible water saturation has a considerable effect on the spontaneous imbibition recovery. Higher irreducible water saturation is always correlated to the lower recovery tendency in low permeable rock [9]. This phenomenon is also verified by Wang et al [10].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…According to the results of Kewen Li and Roland N. Horne, the irreducible water saturation has a considerable effect on the spontaneous imbibition recovery. Higher irreducible water saturation is always correlated to the lower recovery tendency in low permeable rock [9]. This phenomenon is also verified by Wang et al [10].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Some capillary water imbibition experimental results show that the time exponents are much higher than theoretically predicted values (<0.5), such as 0.70 (Family et al 1992) and 0.6 (Li and Horne 2004). Kwon et al (1996) argued that this larger difference may be the different natures of the samples measured.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…It is found from Table 2 that values of the time exponent lie in the range of 0.07-0.50. The porosities of experimental Table 3 Comparisons on the experimental and analytical results for time exponent from building material samples (Karoglou et al 2005 Table 4 Comparisons on the experimental and analytical results for time exponent from chalk (Li and Horne 2004), Berea (Li et al 2006), and Bentonite clay (Brú and Pastor 2006 samples such as paper, fabrics, and paper were not provided in their tests. So, the comparison between the model predictions and experimental results is not provided in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations