2016
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b05878
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Analytical Pipeline for Quantitative Characterization of Dietary Intake: Application To Assess Grape Intake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Where possible, use of 24 h urine samples rather than spot samples is advised for measurement of metabolic changes, particularly when excretion kinetics are not known a priori, partly because spot urine samples vary more in dilution. However, where only spot urine samples are available because of study limitations, such as in the case of the Danish cohort, we found that the time-matched cumulative sample obtained between meals predicted the spot samples with more accuracy than did the 24 h model (appendix p 14), which is consistent with previous work showing accurate quantification of grape intake based on both 24 h samples and cumulative samples matching the excretion kinetics window 22 . For this reason, we compared the spot samples, taken after the first morning void in the Danish cohort with the model derived from cumulative sample 1 (after breakfast to before lunch) (appendix p 11) rather than the 24 h model, because the sampling time was better matched.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Where possible, use of 24 h urine samples rather than spot samples is advised for measurement of metabolic changes, particularly when excretion kinetics are not known a priori, partly because spot urine samples vary more in dilution. However, where only spot urine samples are available because of study limitations, such as in the case of the Danish cohort, we found that the time-matched cumulative sample obtained between meals predicted the spot samples with more accuracy than did the 24 h model (appendix p 14), which is consistent with previous work showing accurate quantification of grape intake based on both 24 h samples and cumulative samples matching the excretion kinetics window 22 . For this reason, we compared the spot samples, taken after the first morning void in the Danish cohort with the model derived from cumulative sample 1 (after breakfast to before lunch) (appendix p 11) rather than the 24 h model, because the sampling time was better matched.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Substantial between-person variability could be seen in concentrations of hippurate (figure 2C) and carnitine (figure 2D), but the direction of association remained the same. For tartaric acid, between-person variability was also apparent, but because it is a quantitative biomarker of grape consumption 22 there was almost no between-person variation after consumption of diet 4, which did not contain any grape-derived products (appendix p 5). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…717 Dietary biomarkers are based on the concept that food intake is highly correlated with excretion levels of food-related compounds over a given period of time. These “biomarkers” can be compounds that are excreted unchanged 10,17 or that have undergone metabolic conversion, for example, by gut bacteria.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, confirmation of a candidate biomarker is best achieved by using a controlled food challenge with subsequent validation in a larger population or study cohort. 17 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%