2016
DOI: 10.1088/2040-8978/18/6/065601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analytical model for the celestial distribution of polarized light, accounting for polarization singularities, wavelength and atmospheric turbidity

Abstract: We present a computationally inexpensive analytical model for simulating celestial polarization patterns in variable conditions. We combine both the singularity theory of Dennis and Berry [1] and the intensity model of Perez [2] such that our single model describes 3 key sets of data: 1) The overhead distribution of the degree of polarization as well as the existence of neutral points in the sky; 2) the change in sky polarization as a function of the turbidity of the atmosphere; and 3) sky polarization pattern… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, degree of polarization can be considered a measure of signal strength for an animal using the skylight pattern of angles of polarization as an orientation cue. Relative to the sun or moon’s position, this angle-of-polarization pattern is similar across a range of conditions (Gál, et al ., 2001; Hegedüs et al ., 2007; Barta et al ., 2014; Wang et al ., 2016). In contrast, the degree of polarization decreases as a result of cloud cover and atmospheric turbidity (Labhart, 1999; Hegedüs et al ., 2007; Wang et al ., 2016) as well as being affected by light pollution on moonlit nights in urban areas (Kyba et al ., 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result, degree of polarization can be considered a measure of signal strength for an animal using the skylight pattern of angles of polarization as an orientation cue. Relative to the sun or moon’s position, this angle-of-polarization pattern is similar across a range of conditions (Gál, et al ., 2001; Hegedüs et al ., 2007; Barta et al ., 2014; Wang et al ., 2016). In contrast, the degree of polarization decreases as a result of cloud cover and atmospheric turbidity (Labhart, 1999; Hegedüs et al ., 2007; Wang et al ., 2016) as well as being affected by light pollution on moonlit nights in urban areas (Kyba et al ., 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relative to the sun or moon’s position, this angle-of-polarization pattern is similar across a range of conditions (Gál, et al ., 2001; Hegedüs et al ., 2007; Barta et al ., 2014; Wang et al ., 2016). In contrast, the degree of polarization decreases as a result of cloud cover and atmospheric turbidity (Labhart, 1999; Hegedüs et al ., 2007; Wang et al ., 2016) as well as being affected by light pollution on moonlit nights in urban areas (Kyba et al ., 2011). Since lunar skylight is far dimmer than solar skylight, contributions to celestial light from other sources can reduce the maximum observable degree of polarization in the night sky, when these light sources have either a low degree of polarization ( e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I ∞ c (T, φ, θ) is computed according to Eqs. (12) and (13). The target with aerial perspective effectÎ VO is calculated using Eq.…”
Section: Proposed Glsl Fragment Shadermentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Such scattering models can be analyzed from captured skies using sky illumination models [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. Due to its simplicity and accuracy for scattering modeling, a heuristic parameter called turbidity (T) has been used to categorize atmospheric conditions [8][9][10][11][12]. Following that approach, we propose a full-spectrum turbidity-based aerial perspective model that enables us to render realistic aerial perspective effects in real time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Light in the sky that scatters in the atmosphere has a maximum of around 60% (Wang et al, 2016) and can be around 40% in the ocean (Cronin et al, 2003a). Polarized animal signals can have a percentage polarizations of up to 80% (Marshall et al, 2014b.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%