2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2020.11.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analytical model for rapid predicting molten pool geometry of selective laser melting (SLM)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be explained by the presence of lack-of-fusion zones which are observed for the parts produced with lower energy densities, which is likely due to narrower and shallower melt pools. It was reported by Dong et al (2021) and Liu et al (2021) that relatively low energy densities lead to poor fusion quality of laser tracks and massive lack-of-fusion zones were observed. As a result, the porosity seen in the parts manufactured with low energy densities is generated due to the incomplete fusion of the metal powder during laser scanning and the creation of lack of fusion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It can be explained by the presence of lack-of-fusion zones which are observed for the parts produced with lower energy densities, which is likely due to narrower and shallower melt pools. It was reported by Dong et al (2021) and Liu et al (2021) that relatively low energy densities lead to poor fusion quality of laser tracks and massive lack-of-fusion zones were observed. As a result, the porosity seen in the parts manufactured with low energy densities is generated due to the incomplete fusion of the metal powder during laser scanning and the creation of lack of fusion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The forming characteristics of melt pool morphologies between adjacent scanning tracks and layers and the effect of melt pool morphology on the final forming geometry of SLM object would be covered in future work. Liquid specific heat capacity 𝐶 𝑙 (J/(kgK)) 720 [40] 872 [41] 770 [3] Solid specific heat capacity 𝐶 𝑠 (J/(kgK)) 435 [40] 763 [41] 680 [3] Latent heat of fusion ℎ sl (J/kg) 2.1e 5 3.65e 5 2.7e 5 Thermal conductivity 𝑘(W/(mK)) 24.1 [42] 21 [42] 36 [42] Boiling temperature 𝑇 𝑏 (K) 3111 [40] 3300 [3] 3273 [15] Melting temperature 𝑇 𝑚 (K) 1609 [42] 1928 [30] 1700 [3] Convection coefficient 𝛼 𝑔 (W(m 2 K)) 8 [43] 10 [44] 100 [45] Thermal radiation coefficient 𝜀 0.32 [40] 0.43 [8] 0.35 [45] Density 𝜌(kg/m 3 ) 7451 [39] 4000 [41] 7800 [42] Powder compaction rate 𝜌 𝑝 /𝜌 𝑠 0.6 [11] 0.6 [11] 0.6 [11] Stefan-Boltzmann coefficient 𝜎(W/(m 2 K 4 )) 5.67e -8 5.67e -8 5.67e -8 Appendix B Adopted energy absorptivity under different machines and process conditions for IN718, TC4 and 316L…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to different melting states, the melt pool steady-state temperature is presumed as shown in Formula (15). 𝜆 indicates the ratio of steady-state temperature ( 𝑇 𝑚𝑠 ) to the melting temperature ( 𝑇 𝑚 ), and is adopted according to experimental observations and experience [3,8].…”
Section: Quantitative Calculation Model Of Melt Pool Morphology 221 Critical Melt Pool Geometry Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the variety of assumptions and idealizations that have to be made are aspects taken into account by the researchers (Hodge et al, 2016;Li et al, 2018b;Luo and Zhao, 2017). The revised works in this item discuss the accuracy (comparing model with experiments) and others depict the numerical calculations' computational throughput (Liu et al, 2021). The tridimensional transient thermal behavior of the fabricated parts is commonly obtained by solving the following governing equations of conservation of mass, momentum and energy (Gu et al, 2020;Kan et al, 2021;Marin et al, 2021):…”
Section: Thermo-mechanical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%