2015
DOI: 10.1007/s40314-015-0250-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analytical description of the time-integrated Brownian bridge

Abstract: In animal movement research, the probability density function (PDF) of the time-integrated Brownian bridge (TIBB) is used to delineate important regions on the basis of tracking data. Here, it is assumed that an animal performs a Brownian bridge between the data points. As such, the location at any moment in time of an individual performing a Brownian bridge is described by a normal distribution. The (time-independent) marginal probability density at a given point, i.e., the value of the PDF of the TIBB at tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, [ 83 ] estimated home range sizes of fledgling wood thrushes ranged between 0.026 and 0.25 km 2 whereas in our study estimated home range sizes ranged between 0.019 and 8.7 km 2 . In light of the development of improved analysis methods for estimating habitat use [ 69 , 72 , 86 ], observed differences are of course, understandable. Although these ranges overlap at the lower end, the discrepancy in differing upper ranges is likely due to differences in the landscapes and habitat composition between the two studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, [ 83 ] estimated home range sizes of fledgling wood thrushes ranged between 0.026 and 0.25 km 2 whereas in our study estimated home range sizes ranged between 0.019 and 8.7 km 2 . In light of the development of improved analysis methods for estimating habitat use [ 69 , 72 , 86 ], observed differences are of course, understandable. Although these ranges overlap at the lower end, the discrepancy in differing upper ranges is likely due to differences in the landscapes and habitat composition between the two studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is determined by the registered locations, the time between those locations and the animal’s mobility, which are not accounted for in some alternative approaches [ 70 , 71 ]. Here, the PDF is constructed for each individual and for each period pre- and post-independence using the analytical solution proposed by [ 72 ] using Mathematica (ver. 11.1.1.0).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%