Lecture Notes in Computer Science
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-72697-5_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Analytical Comparison of the Slow-but-Steady and Impatient Variants of TCP New Reno

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, more recent TCP implementations, like NewReno or Cubic, have more complex error recovery mechanisms that allow recovering multiple losses during the FR phase. Other works have extended SRF and AM in order to account for FR phase' dynamics with Slow But Steady (SBS) flavor [12], [13]. The most prominent innovation in [12] and [13], with respect to [11], is that both bursty and independent losses are modelled.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, more recent TCP implementations, like NewReno or Cubic, have more complex error recovery mechanisms that allow recovering multiple losses during the FR phase. Other works have extended SRF and AM in order to account for FR phase' dynamics with Slow But Steady (SBS) flavor [12], [13]. The most prominent innovation in [12] and [13], with respect to [11], is that both bursty and independent losses are modelled.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other works have extended SRF and AM in order to account for FR phase' dynamics with Slow But Steady (SBS) flavor [12], [13]. The most prominent innovation in [12] and [13], with respect to [11], is that both bursty and independent losses are modelled.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations