2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2016.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analytical and numerical study of long wave run-up in U-shaped and V-shaped bays

Abstract: By assuming the flow is uniform along the narrow long bays, the 2-D nonlinear shallowwater equations are reduced to a linear semi-axis variable-coefficient 1-D wave equation via the generalized Carrier-Greenspan transformation. The run-up of long waves in constantly sloping U-shaped and V-shaped bays is studied both analytically and numerically within the framework of the 1-D nonlinear shallow-water theory. An analytic solution, in the form of a double integral, to the resulting linear wave equation is obtaine… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to the previous numerical experiment, we consider a zero-velocity initial condition (η 0 , 0) and run it by the standard CG to compute the maximum run-up (t = t r ), rundown (t = t d ) and the secondary run-up t = t s . The secondary run-up of a Gaussian wave is a feature of the V-shaped bay as it was noted by Garayshin et al [20], Nicolsky et al [30]. Now, while modeling the wave dynamics, we save the time history of η (x, t) and u (x, t) at some point x = x * near the shore (e.g.…”
Section: Verification Of the Boundary Value Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar to the previous numerical experiment, we consider a zero-velocity initial condition (η 0 , 0) and run it by the standard CG to compute the maximum run-up (t = t r ), rundown (t = t d ) and the secondary run-up t = t s . The secondary run-up of a Gaussian wave is a feature of the V-shaped bay as it was noted by Garayshin et al [20], Nicolsky et al [30]. Now, while modeling the wave dynamics, we save the time history of η (x, t) and u (x, t) at some point x = x * near the shore (e.g.…”
Section: Verification Of the Boundary Value Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(12) is the standard (constant coefficient) 1 + 1 wave equation and hence can be solved by the d'Alembert formula [15]. For an arbitrary power bay ( f (y) ∼ |y| m , m > 0, which corresponds to S(H ) ∼ H (m+1)/m ) there is no d'Alembert solution but a similar to (12) equation takes place, which can be solved by the very same techniques [20] as for the plane beach. Note that the plane beach corresponds to m = ∞.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analytical solutions to the wave profile runup have also been found in more complex bathymetries using the CSA SWEs, for parabolic bays (Didenkulova & Pelinovsky, ) and more generally in U‐shaped and V‐shaped bays (Anderson et al, ; Didenkulova & Pelinovsky, ; Garayshin et al, ; Rybkin et al, ). Preliminary results by Harris et al (), Garayshin et al (), and Anderson et al () show that the runup at the head of the U‐shaped bay computed by the 2‐D SWEs equations and that computed by the CSA SWEs are comparable in height and timing. A limitation of the previously mentioned results for the U‐shaped bays is the symmetric and simple nature of the cross sections of the bathymetries under consideration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recall that the vast majority of results that have been derived by use of Carrier-Greenspan (CG) transform in the context of plane beaches, for example, Carrier and Greenspan (1957), Synolakis (1991Synolakis ( , 1987, Carrier et al (2003), and Kanoglu and Synolakis (2006). Analytical solutions to the wave profile runup have also been found in more complex bathymetries using the CSA SWEs, for parabolic bays (Didenkulova & Pelinovsky, 2011b) and more generally in U-shaped and V-shaped bays (Anderson et al, 2017;Didenkulova & Pelinovsky, 2011a;Garayshin et al, 2016;Rybkin et al, 2014). Preliminary results by Harris et al (2015), Garayshin et al (2016), and Anderson et al (2017) show that the runup at the head of the U-shaped bay computed by the 2-D SWEs equations and that computed by the CSA SWEs are comparable in height and timing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mathematically, the validity of channel theory application for solving such problems was proved in [14]. From the practical point of view, its accuracy is assessed by a comparison with direct numerical solution of shallow water equations for waves in the bay of Alaska [15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%