1998
DOI: 10.1007/s002200050341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Analytic Description of the Vector Constrained KP Hierarchy

Abstract: In this paper we give a geometric description in terms of the Grassmann manifold of Segal and Wilson, of the reduction of the KP hierarchy known as the vector kconstrained KP hierarchy. We also show in a geometric way that these hierarchies are equivalent to Krichever's general rational reductions of the KP hierarchy.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that given a τ function for KP with corresponding Lax pseudodifferential operator L we say that τ ∈ cKP m,n iff L m can be written as the ratio of two differential operators of order m + n and n respectively. These special reductions of KP begun to be studied in 1995 by Dickey and Krichever ([18], [19]); a geometric interpretation of corresponding points in the Grassmannian has been given in [21] and [22]. Going back to theorem 3.16 we point out that the first decomposition as well as the recursion formula are already known and, as pointed out in [20], come simply from the fact that we have a truncated dressing.…”
Section: Gl(n C)mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This means that given a τ function for KP with corresponding Lax pseudodifferential operator L we say that τ ∈ cKP m,n iff L m can be written as the ratio of two differential operators of order m + n and n respectively. These special reductions of KP begun to be studied in 1995 by Dickey and Krichever ([18], [19]); a geometric interpretation of corresponding points in the Grassmannian has been given in [21] and [22]. Going back to theorem 3.16 we point out that the first decomposition as well as the recursion formula are already known and, as pointed out in [20], come simply from the fact that we have a truncated dressing.…”
Section: Gl(n C)mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The polynomial CKP Sato Grassmannian consists of linear subspaces of Gr (0) (H) such that for any f (z), g(z) ∈ W one has (f (z), g(−z)) = 0. To describe the spaces corresponding to the 2-vector 1-constrained CKP hierarchy, such W must also satisfy the following condition [11], [12], [3]. There exists a subspace (6.5) W ⊂ W of codimension 2 such that zW ⊂ W. We assume that there is no larger subspace W with zW ⊂ W .…”
Section: The Space Gr(h) Has a Subdivision Into Different Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They often possess a geometric description in terms of the Grassmann manifold, see e.g. [5,6,9]. In this paper one considers inside the lower triangular Toda hierarchies analogues and generalizations of reductions like the nth Gelfand-Dickey hierarchy and the AKNS-hierarchy and presents here their geometric description.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%