2018
DOI: 10.21848/asr.2018.14.3.158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Analysis Study of Features for Hearing Aid Satisfaction Questionnaires: Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life, Client Oriented Scale of Improvement, International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids

Abstract: This study was aimed to provide translated questionnaires in Korean including Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life (SADL), Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI), and International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA) and analyze their reliabilities and validities for measuring and improving hearing-aid satisfaction level in Korea. Methods: Fifty people who were fitted with their new hearing-aids participated (70.4 ± 12.4). All the participants answered Korean-IOI-HA and newly translated S… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SADL scale, developed by Cox et al [4] is a simple questionnaire that can evaluate various elements of satisfaction independently. Translated versions of the SADL have been validated as useful tools for measuring satisfaction with hearing aids and fittings in Korea [26]. Various variables of satisfaction are summed up in four items and 15 questions in various questionnaires and investigations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SADL scale, developed by Cox et al [4] is a simple questionnaire that can evaluate various elements of satisfaction independently. Translated versions of the SADL have been validated as useful tools for measuring satisfaction with hearing aids and fittings in Korea [26]. Various variables of satisfaction are summed up in four items and 15 questions in various questionnaires and investigations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%