2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.apnum.2021.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis on the penalty and Nitsche's methods for the Stokes–Darcy system with a curved interface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various numerical discretizations were developed subsequently. The discontinuous Galerkin method was considered in References 8,9 and 13. The mortar element method was proposed in References 1 and 4.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Various numerical discretizations were developed subsequently. The discontinuous Galerkin method was considered in References 8,9 and 13. The mortar element method was proposed in References 1 and 4.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is more realistic to model the coupled problem with curved interfaces. As far as we know, there is one paper 13 to deal with the Darcy–Stokes system with a curved interface based on interface‐fitted meshes. But for complicated or moving interface, the generation of interface‐fitted meshes is expensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The penalty method is effective in the numerical solution of constrained problems. It is a useful tool in proving the existence of the solution to constrained problems, see ( [20]- [22]). And the generalized penalty method is the generalization of the penalty method, cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it is well known, the standard mixed formulations for the Stokes equations and Darcy equations earn different compatibility conditions, thus a straightforward application of the existing solvers for the Stokes equations and Darcy equations may not be feasible. To this end, a great amount of effort has been devoted to developing accurate and efficient numerical schemes for the coupled Stokes-Darcy problem, and a non-exhaustive list of these approaches include Lagrange multiplier methods [21,17,32,18], weak Galerkin method [9,22], strongly conservative methods [20,16], stabilized mixed finite element method [28,24], discontinuous Galerkin (DG) methods [26,34], virtual element method [23,33], a lowest-order staggered DG method [37] and penalty methods [38]. The coupled Stokes-Darcy problem describes multiphysics phenomena, and involves a Stokes subproblem and a Darcy subproblem, it is thus natural to resort to domain decomposition methods, which allows one to solve the coupled system sequentially with a low computational cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%