2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis on the flow behavior of MHD nanofluid with heat generation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, his results show close agreement with Massey and Clayton [9]. A few notable studies related to non‐Newtonian fluids were found in [16–25], heat transfer along with nanofluids [26–36], and stretching surfaces [37, 38].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…However, his results show close agreement with Massey and Clayton [9]. A few notable studies related to non‐Newtonian fluids were found in [16–25], heat transfer along with nanofluids [26–36], and stretching surfaces [37, 38].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Many studies on the analysis of heat transfer from various geometrical shapes with different fluid models and different flow assumptions have recently been discovered (see, for instance [29][30][31][32][33]), which inspire us to continue filling in the gaps. In the above-cited literature, only [16] and [28] cover the studies in which the bodies of revolution having a variable radius have been considered.…”
Section: Curle and Skanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical simulations such as computer-aided engineering (CAE) [9][10][11][12] and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) [13][14][15] are used instead of experiments, greatly saving costs of time and money. Scholars have used CFD [16][17][18][19][20][21] and CAE [22][23][24][25] methods in the study of nanofluids [26,27], bionic engineering [28,29], engineering architecture [30], and other fields. Computer-aided simulations enable the observation of many details that cannot be captured by experiments, allowing for more in-depth studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%