2012
DOI: 10.1109/twc.2012.011812.110279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Analysis of Uplink Base Station Cooperation with Practical Constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, (13) and (15b) can be rewritten as (17) and (18), respectively, which means that S1 with N s = (N − 1) and the optimal MRC scheme have the same soft output of the demapper for the first bit of the symbol x.…”
Section: Qpsk Modulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, (13) and (15b) can be rewritten as (17) and (18), respectively, which means that S1 with N s = (N − 1) and the optimal MRC scheme have the same soft output of the demapper for the first bit of the symbol x.…”
Section: Qpsk Modulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NICE has been shown to significantly improve the achievable rates through interference cancellation [3] [4]. With cancellation of up to six dominant interferers and three rounds of NICE decoding, edge and mean user throughputs were approximately doubled, achieving similar throughput gains as network MIMO but with significantly less backhaul.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another uplink cooperative scheme is the Network Interference Cancellation Engine (NICE) [3] [4]. By opportunistically sharing decoded bits between base stations, NICE has been shown to yield similar throughput gains as network MIMO but with one to two orders of magnitude less backhaul.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motivated by the need to achieve performance improvements similar to network MIMO but with much lower backhaul overhead, we have proposed a novel network interference cancellation engine (NICE) technique which opportunistically cancels dominant out‐of‐cell interferers by exchanging decoded data for these interferers among cooperating cells [3, 4]. Base stations attempting to decode a user can then generate estimates of the signals received from the interfering mobile station and cancel them out from their respective aggregate received signals, thus improving the desired user's signal‐to‐interference‐plus‐noise ratio (SINR) and, consequently, the transmission rate at which the user can be decoded.…”
Section: Network‐centric Uplink Cooperation Techniques For Interferenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inter‐site distance is assumed to be 500 meters, which is representative of an interference‐limited deployment. We also assume a mobile terminal with a single transmit antenna and two uncorrelated receive antennas at each sector; ideal channel estimation is assumed for all the techniques considered (see [4] for results with non‐ideal LMMSE‐based channel estimation). HARQ with incremental redundancy is employed with a maximum of four transmissions and a block error rate target of 20 percent on the first transmission.…”
Section: Performance Benefits Of Uplink Cooperation Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%