2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-19551-3_27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Analysis of Twitter Data on E-cigarette Sentiments and Promotion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, building and using a classifier that separates marketing tweets is an important pre-processing step in several efforts. We are aware of at least four such efforts [10,14,18,20] on building automatic classifiers for e-cig marketing tweets for various end-goals. Other researchers who studied e-cig tweets focused on sentiment analysis [14,30] and diffusion of messages from e-cig brands on Twitter [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As such, building and using a classifier that separates marketing tweets is an important pre-processing step in several efforts. We are aware of at least four such efforts [10,14,18,20] on building automatic classifiers for e-cig marketing tweets for various end-goals. Other researchers who studied e-cig tweets focused on sentiment analysis [14,30] and diffusion of messages from e-cig brands on Twitter [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are aware of at least four such efforts [10,14,18,20] on building automatic classifiers for e-cig marketing tweets for various end-goals. Other researchers who studied e-cig tweets focused on sentiment analysis [14,30] and diffusion of messages from e-cig brands on Twitter [8]. In our current effort

We manually estimated the proportion of marketing and non-marketing tweets to be 48.6 % (45.5–51.7 %) : 51.4 % (48.3–54.5 %) from a sample of 1000 randomly selected tweets selected from over one million e-cig tweets collected through Twitter streaming API between 4/2015 and 6/2016 (Sect.

…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ratio of direct tweets (18%) shows also a significant expected reaction from consumers, by replying or following advice, warnings, requests or invitations. Similar to us, Godea et al [9] identify tweets' purposes in healthcare (advertising, informational, positive or negative opinions). However, we focus on intentions as established by pragmatics, ensuring thus a domain-independent, general approach.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Additionally, the limitations of the machine learning classifier have been explicitly mentioned by the authors as their future work; however, it does not talk about any concrete intervention. [17] proposes a supervised approach to identifying sentiments and information dissemination concerning e-cigarettes from Twitter data. Again, it is limited to analysis and doesn't provide solution for scalable public health interventions.…”
Section: A Machine Learning In Behavior Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%