2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10494-019-00045-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Analysis of Turbulent Mixing Effects on the Soot Formation in High Pressure n-dodecane Sprays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the total soot mass for the URANS case increases slowly to reach a QSS while no soot spike is observed. This prediction is similar to those reported in [7,8,15,34]. This implies that the URANS turbulence closure approach is the main reason for the failed prediction of the soot spike formation.…”
Section: Soot Spikesupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, the total soot mass for the URANS case increases slowly to reach a QSS while no soot spike is observed. This prediction is similar to those reported in [7,8,15,34]. This implies that the URANS turbulence closure approach is the main reason for the failed prediction of the soot spike formation.…”
Section: Soot Spikesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Numerical models, once being validated, can be used to elucidate different phenomena and expand on the limited details from experimental measurements. To gain a better understanding of the soot formation processes, different soot models (e.g sectional soot model and phenoemenological soot model) [7][8][9] have been proposed to study soot formation processes in Spray A. With the implementation of the well-stirred reactor (WSR) model where turbulence chemistry interaction (TCI) is not considered, Wang et al [9] and Razak et al [7] were able to capture the overall steady-state SVF with varying O 2 levels in their Unsteady Reynolds Naiver Stokes (URANS) simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%