2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2011.08.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis of trade-offs between multiple ecosystem services and stakeholders linked to land use and water quality management in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
68
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
3
68
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were found by Butler et al (2013), who observed that different land-use management options generated trade-offs between promoting food production and water quality regulation in an Australian catchment. Land-use change motivated by economic gains and market services, such as intensive agriculture, also needs to consider the diversity of other ecosystem services and their associated values (Bateman et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Similar results were found by Butler et al (2013), who observed that different land-use management options generated trade-offs between promoting food production and water quality regulation in an Australian catchment. Land-use change motivated by economic gains and market services, such as intensive agriculture, also needs to consider the diversity of other ecosystem services and their associated values (Bateman et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Synergy is a win-win process in which two kinds of ecosystem services increase; for instance, surface water quality and soil retention, pasture production, and freshwater supply (Qiu and Turner 2013). As a general result of the correlation analysis, the coefficient value for a tradeoff relationship is shown as negative and the synergy is positive (Chan et al 2006;Egoh et al 2009;Butler et al 2013). Although the correlation analysis provides a relatively concise and explicit method for judging the potential tradeoffs and synergies, the specific application process still requires attention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, in order to provide implications for sustainable land-use management, researches on the types of interactions and the corresponding feedbacks among different ecosystem services are stimulated. For example, Brauman et al (2007) revealed that water quality regulation services with other services, such as habit for biodiversity and climate regulation, can be co-delivered by vegetation, requiring the analysis of trade-offs among multiple services (Butler et al, 2013). It has been a major research priority to consider biodiversity conservation bundles and ecosystem services bundles during payment implementation (Wendland et al, 2010).…”
Section: Trade-offs In Ecosystemsmentioning
confidence: 99%