1968
DOI: 10.1002/sce.3730520410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis of the understanding of the nature of science by prospective secondary science teachers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0
3

Year Published

1996
1996
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
3
18
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach intentionally draws learners' attention to relevant aspects of NOS through discussion, guided reflection, and specific questioning in the context of activities, investigations, and historical examples intended to improve learners' conceptions of NOS. Relative to the implicit and historical approaches, the explicit approach has been more effective in helping learners achieve adequate conceptions of NOS (e.g., Akindehin, 1988;Abd-El-Khalick, Bell, & Lederman, 1998;Billeh & Hasan, 1975;Carey & Stauss, 1968Jones, 1969;Ogunniyi, 1983;Olstad, 1969;Ryder, Leach, & Driver, 1999). The authors strongly believe that a functional understanding of NOS can best be facilitated through an explicit, reflective approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This approach intentionally draws learners' attention to relevant aspects of NOS through discussion, guided reflection, and specific questioning in the context of activities, investigations, and historical examples intended to improve learners' conceptions of NOS. Relative to the implicit and historical approaches, the explicit approach has been more effective in helping learners achieve adequate conceptions of NOS (e.g., Akindehin, 1988;Abd-El-Khalick, Bell, & Lederman, 1998;Billeh & Hasan, 1975;Carey & Stauss, 1968Jones, 1969;Ogunniyi, 1983;Olstad, 1969;Ryder, Leach, & Driver, 1999). The authors strongly believe that a functional understanding of NOS can best be facilitated through an explicit, reflective approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Researchers who adopted this approach (Akindehin, 1988;Billeh & Hasan, 1975;Carey & Stauss, 1968, 1970Jones, 1969;Lavach, 1969;Ogunniyi, 1983) used elements from history and philosophy of science and/or instruction geared toward the various aspects of NOS to improve science teachers' conceptions.…”
Section: Improving Science Teachers' Views Of Nosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and proper assessment and investigation of specific belief constructs" (p. 307). Science teachers' epistemological beliefs is a specific belief construct that has been the focus of many recent studies in science education (e.g., Benson, 1989;Billeh & Malik, 1977;Carey & Stauss, 1968;Gallagher, 1991; Hashweh, 1991; Hodson, 1985;King, 1991;Nadeau & Desautels, 1984; Prawat, 1992).Very few studies, however, have examined the effects of these beliefs in teaching, although such studies could provide important construct validation for the assessment of epistemological beliefs. Etchberger and Shaw (1992), for example, traced the change in a science teacher's beliefs about teaching and learning and how these beliefs influenced her teaching methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%