2019
DOI: 10.1177/1558866119884895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Analysis of the Structure, Validity, and Reliability of the Collegian Attitudes Toward Inclusive Campus Recreation (CAICR) Scale

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to test the construct validity and internal consistency of the Collegian Attitudes toward Inclusive Campus Recreation (CAICR) Scale, a collegiate adaptation of the Children’s Attitudes toward Integrated Physical Education–Revised Scale. The CAICR seeks to measure attitudes toward inclusive lifetime fitness, sport, and recreation at the collegiate level. Participants were 192 college students. The factor structure of the scale was investigated using a confirmatory factor analysis w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies also examined complexities related to gender such participation differences between man and woman (e.g., Chu & Zhang, 2018; Cooper et al, 2012; Guan et al, 2020), the LGTBQ community (e.g., Anderson et al, 2020; Patchett & Foster, 2015; Phipps, 2021) and the relationship between gender and the provision of programing (e.g., McDowell et al, 2016; Schneider et al, 2014; Soler et al, 2017). Studies also investigated the experiences of students with physical disabilities (e.g., Devine, 2016; Dysterheft et al, 2018; McKay et al, 2019), the design of adaptive programing (e.g., Fines & Block, 2021; Gillies & Dupuis, 2013; Shapiro et al, 2020) and the prevalence of programing for vulnerable populations (e.g., Horacek et al, 2014; Zuest et al, 2021). Some scholars also examined participation trends among students registered in specific educational programs (e.g., Gathman et al, 2017; Slade & Kies, 2015), differences between undergraduate and graduate students (e.g., Henchy, 2013) and participation among first year students (e.g., Chu & Zhang, 2018; Deng et al, 2021; Helms & Moiseichik, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies also examined complexities related to gender such participation differences between man and woman (e.g., Chu & Zhang, 2018; Cooper et al, 2012; Guan et al, 2020), the LGTBQ community (e.g., Anderson et al, 2020; Patchett & Foster, 2015; Phipps, 2021) and the relationship between gender and the provision of programing (e.g., McDowell et al, 2016; Schneider et al, 2014; Soler et al, 2017). Studies also investigated the experiences of students with physical disabilities (e.g., Devine, 2016; Dysterheft et al, 2018; McKay et al, 2019), the design of adaptive programing (e.g., Fines & Block, 2021; Gillies & Dupuis, 2013; Shapiro et al, 2020) and the prevalence of programing for vulnerable populations (e.g., Horacek et al, 2014; Zuest et al, 2021). Some scholars also examined participation trends among students registered in specific educational programs (e.g., Gathman et al, 2017; Slade & Kies, 2015), differences between undergraduate and graduate students (e.g., Henchy, 2013) and participation among first year students (e.g., Chu & Zhang, 2018; Deng et al, 2021; Helms & Moiseichik, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CAICR scale measures attitudes toward inclusivity and willingness to modify sport in recreationally active college students. The 11-item CAICR demonstrated high internal consistency according to McDonald’s ω of .90 (McKay et al, 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main outcomes were attitudes toward inclusion and sports modification. They were assessed using the Collegian Attitudes toward Inclusive Campus Recreation (CAICR) scale (McKay et al, 2019). The CAICR scale measures attitudes toward inclusivity and willingness to modify sport in recreationally active college students.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations