2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0731-7085(03)00182-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis of the SFSTP guide on validation of chromatographic bioanalytical methods: progresses and limitations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
97
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
97
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are shown in table 2. The precision results indicate that the current method was reliable and repeatable [23]. Thus, the methodology can be applied for the determination of drug in different formulations like targeting of pancreatic as well as for bladder cancer.…”
Section: Interday Precisionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results are shown in table 2. The precision results indicate that the current method was reliable and repeatable [23]. Thus, the methodology can be applied for the determination of drug in different formulations like targeting of pancreatic as well as for bladder cancer.…”
Section: Interday Precisionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The result was indicated as %RSD, which should be less than 2 as shown in table 6. The ruggedness analysis, indicates that there was no significant change in reliability and repeatability of methodology with the change of analyst [23].…”
Section: Ruggedness Studymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Sendo assim, uma vez otimizados, os procedimentos de análise precisam ser validados segundo critérios estabelecidos na literatura [115][116][117][118][119] . Normalmente, o processo de validação é feito empregando o fármaco na forma de mistura racêmica.…”
Section: Aspectos Relevantes Na Análise Enantiosseletivaunclassified
“…A slight constant carry over effect was still observed, being <0.3% for both substances after analysis of a plasma sample spiked with 50 ng ml −1 of CPA and 2.5 ng ml −1 of MPA. [25][26][27] The validation results of the response function are presented in Table 1. A weighted linear regression (1/X 2 ) with Table 1 Validation results six concentration levels was used and its goodness of fit is illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Selectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A novel approach based on the accuracy profile as decision tool has been used for the validation of the present method [25,26]. By this approach, using two-sided 95% ␤-expectation tolerance intervals for the total measurement error, the performance of the procedure can be better visualized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%