2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.wsif.2020.102419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis of the respective contributions of husband and wife in farming households in Kenya to decisions regarding the use of income: A multinomial logit approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The associations between the gendered division of labour and time poverty have long been acknowledged (see, for example, Adeyeeye et al., 2019; Arora and Rada, 2017; Rao and Raju, 2020), as have the ways in which women use their voice and agency in response to inequalities in time allocation (for example, Agarwal, 1997; Blackden and Wodon, 2006; Doss, 2013). Similarly, our findings that women can easily adjust their schedules but must carefully navigate relationships with husbands to be able to attend trainings or to take on new income‐generating activities align with previous findings that women consistently have higher involvement in smaller decisions (for example on household purchases for daily needs) compared to larger ones (for example for large household purchases) (Kishor and Subaiya, 2008; Osanya et al., 2020). While these themes have been observed previously in studies of women's empowerment, to our knowledge, our study is the first to connect them to time use and time‐use agency.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The associations between the gendered division of labour and time poverty have long been acknowledged (see, for example, Adeyeeye et al., 2019; Arora and Rada, 2017; Rao and Raju, 2020), as have the ways in which women use their voice and agency in response to inequalities in time allocation (for example, Agarwal, 1997; Blackden and Wodon, 2006; Doss, 2013). Similarly, our findings that women can easily adjust their schedules but must carefully navigate relationships with husbands to be able to attend trainings or to take on new income‐generating activities align with previous findings that women consistently have higher involvement in smaller decisions (for example on household purchases for daily needs) compared to larger ones (for example for large household purchases) (Kishor and Subaiya, 2008; Osanya et al., 2020). While these themes have been observed previously in studies of women's empowerment, to our knowledge, our study is the first to connect them to time use and time‐use agency.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Therefore, using the household head as the gender identifier constrains matching the individual in charge of the plot activities to input use and productivity (Peterman et al, 2011). In addition, while recent studies such as Osanya et al (2020) offer insights on intra-household decision making on resource sharing, the extant literature on TE is predominantly based on farm-level data rather that plot-level data; this ignores the possibility of a farmer having multiple plots with varying characteristics (Owusu et al, 2017). The current study contributes to the literature on efficiency by using sex of the plot manager as the gender indicator on plot-level data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of papers also investigate intra-household decision making and, in particular, the consequences that stem from women having more decisionmaking power as a result of empowerment. The gendered nature of decision making within households is still evident, with men typically controlling decision making on assets and the control and use of assets, particularly where productive assets were concerned [for examples in Kenya, see Nyongesa et al (2017) and Osanya et al (2020); and for Ethiopia see Kang et al (2020)]. In Uganda's Masindi district, a study investigated the decision-making processes that led to land-use transformation through woodlots and tree planting finding that, whilst various factors were considered in decision making, ultimately final decisions were made by husbands, with less participation from wives and other family members (Ahimbisibwe et al, 2019).…”
Section: Intra-household Decision Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%