1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf02651653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis of the low temperature, low and high strain-rate deformation of Ti−6Al−4V

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
115
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 265 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
115
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[4][5][6][7][8] In general, the results show that, to a greater or lesser extent, most non-metallic and composite materials exhibit a significant change in mechanical properties when deformed under different strain rates and temperatures. Several mechanisms have been proposed to account for the change in mechanical properties prompted by high velocity deformation, including dislocation damping, 9) thermally-activated mechanisms, 10) and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6][7][8] In general, the results show that, to a greater or lesser extent, most non-metallic and composite materials exhibit a significant change in mechanical properties when deformed under different strain rates and temperatures. Several mechanisms have been proposed to account for the change in mechanical properties prompted by high velocity deformation, including dislocation damping, 9) thermally-activated mechanisms, 10) and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, polycrystalline metals and crystalline alloys with FCC [35,36], BCC [37], and HCP [38] structures normally exhibit a higher strength at dynamic strain rates than that at quasi-static strain rates. In the case of metallic glasses, localized shear band formation is the dominant deformation mode at room temperature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Ti-Al-4V material parameters for the MTS model are summarized in Table 1 (Follansbee and Gray 1989). In order to see the difference between the traditional JC model and the MTS model, the material flow stresses are plotted as a function of strain at three different temperature levels, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Mts Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%