2020
DOI: 10.1002/agr.21644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis of the impacts of tasting experience and peer effects on consumers’ willingness to pay for novel foods

Abstract: This paper investigates the impacts of tasting experience and observing peers' taste preferences on consumers' willingness to pay (WTP) for novel insect-based food products. In an empirical incentivized discrete choice experiment (DCE) developed to estimate Kenyan consumers' WTP for buns made with cricket flour, we test two treatments against a control treatment using a between-subject design. The control treatment is a typical DCE questionnaire survey. Treatment 1 is identical to the control except that respo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, consumers are unwilling to have unfamiliar foods due to the lack of information and understanding of the product [ 18 ], which may lead to lower consumption intentions by deriving less expectations [ 19 ]. The taste experience of consumers, as well as their peers, influences consumer preferences for food products [ 20 ]. Integrating consumption experience into food preference research might enable the observation of the true perception of consumers [ 21 , 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, consumers are unwilling to have unfamiliar foods due to the lack of information and understanding of the product [ 18 ], which may lead to lower consumption intentions by deriving less expectations [ 19 ]. The taste experience of consumers, as well as their peers, influences consumer preferences for food products [ 20 ]. Integrating consumption experience into food preference research might enable the observation of the true perception of consumers [ 21 , 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, consumers with the lowest income have shown the highest willingness to consume insects. This could be explained since insects are considered as food consumed by primitive people and associated with poverty [ 40 , 41 ]. Additionally, meat consumption compared to other sources of protein increases with the increase of income [ 7 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Middle level income earners (Ksh 20,000–30,000) perceived the ethics aspect to be less important than those who earned relatively lower incomes. This might be explained given that insects are affiliated with primitive people and often associated with poverty ( Osimani et al, 2018 ; Alemu and Olsen, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%