2003
DOI: 10.2190/dwqt-tya4-t20w-rcwh
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Analysis of the High Attrition Rates among First Year College Science, Math, and Engineering Majors

Abstract: Increases in attrition rates among science, mathematics, and engineering (SME) majors have produced a variety of deleterious effects for the society. This article attempts to clarify and interpret the interaction of those characteristics of the structure and culture of undergraduate SME programs that perpetuate high loss rates among their first year college majors. The interaction of instructional factors, differing high school and college faculty expectations for entering SME undergraduates, and epistemologic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
107
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(22 reference statements)
2
107
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such factors include inadequate academic advising, career counseling, and insttuton support; feelings of isolaton in STEM felds because too few peers pursue STEM degrees and too few role models and mentors are available (mainly pertnent to women and underrepresented minorites); distaste for the compettve climate in STEM departments (women especially); perceived discriminaton on the basis of sex and/or race/ethnicity in the STEM workforce; and atracton of lucratve careers such as health care and business (Betnger, 2010;Carrell, Page & West, 2010;Chang, Eagan, Lin & Hurtado, 2011;Daempfe, 2003;Eagan, Herrera, Garibay, Hurtado & Chang, 2011;Espinosa, 2011;Fouad et al, 2010;Gayles & Ampaw, 2014;Price, 2010;Shaw & Barbut, 2010). These contextual and climate factors are now considered as areas worthy of investgaton for explaining the departure of students (especially women and minorites) from STEM felds, although these data are rarely collected by natonal surveys.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such factors include inadequate academic advising, career counseling, and insttuton support; feelings of isolaton in STEM felds because too few peers pursue STEM degrees and too few role models and mentors are available (mainly pertnent to women and underrepresented minorites); distaste for the compettve climate in STEM departments (women especially); perceived discriminaton on the basis of sex and/or race/ethnicity in the STEM workforce; and atracton of lucratve careers such as health care and business (Betnger, 2010;Carrell, Page & West, 2010;Chang, Eagan, Lin & Hurtado, 2011;Daempfe, 2003;Eagan, Herrera, Garibay, Hurtado & Chang, 2011;Espinosa, 2011;Fouad et al, 2010;Gayles & Ampaw, 2014;Price, 2010;Shaw & Barbut, 2010). These contextual and climate factors are now considered as areas worthy of investgaton for explaining the departure of students (especially women and minorites) from STEM felds, although these data are rarely collected by natonal surveys.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of organic chemistry, we aimed to increase student comfort with constructing their own knowledge, which is an important skill for all professionals. Because teaching methods in organic chemistry and other gateway science courses are frequently cited by students who decide to leave STEM (Seymour, 1995;Seymour and Hewitt, 2000;Daempfle, 2004) or pre-health tracks (Barr, 2010;Barr et al, 2010), the study also intended to explore the way innovations in class format and learning activities might influence students' perceptions of science instruction.…”
Section: Objectives and Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though there are many potential reasons for these changes, all scenarios are detrimental to the engineering profession. Studies show evidence of a definite lack of creativity training within the engineering curriculum, as well as extensive evidence of attrition from engineering majors to other programs (Kazerounian & Foley, 2007;Daempfle, 2003;Astin & Astin, 1992;Marra, Rodgers, Shen, & Bogue, 2012;Shuman, Delaney, Wolfe, Scalise, & Besterfield-Sacre, 1999). …”
Section: Creative Thinking In Engineering Undergraduatesmentioning
confidence: 99%