2009
DOI: 10.1080/07418820903357673
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Analysis of the Effectiveness of Community Notification and Registration: Do the Best Intentions Predict the Best Practices?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A more recent examination found no significant effect of Megan's Law (and several other types of reforms) on reports of forcible rape from 1970 to 2003 (Ackerman, Sacks, & Greenberg, in press). Other studies have produced similar, nonsignificant results (Schram & Milloy, 1995;Zgoba, Veysey, & Dalessandro, 2010). To illustrate an exception, Letourneau, Levenson, Bandyopadhyay, Armstrong, and Sinha (2010) reported an 11% reduction in sex crime arrests (first-time offenses only) in South Carolina following the passage of a registration and notification policy.…”
Section: Sex Offender Registries Logic and Efficacymentioning
confidence: 57%
“…A more recent examination found no significant effect of Megan's Law (and several other types of reforms) on reports of forcible rape from 1970 to 2003 (Ackerman, Sacks, & Greenberg, in press). Other studies have produced similar, nonsignificant results (Schram & Milloy, 1995;Zgoba, Veysey, & Dalessandro, 2010). To illustrate an exception, Letourneau, Levenson, Bandyopadhyay, Armstrong, and Sinha (2010) reported an 11% reduction in sex crime arrests (first-time offenses only) in South Carolina following the passage of a registration and notification policy.…”
Section: Sex Offender Registries Logic and Efficacymentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Although the methodology used by Duwe and Donnay (2008) and the findings they reported have been widely misinterpreted in subsequent studies (Freeman, 2009;Kernsmith, Comartin, Craun, & Kernsmith, 2009;Tewksbury & Zgoba, 2010;Tewksbury & Jennings, 2010;Zgoba, Veysey, & Dalessandro, 2010), the results indicate there are conditions under which community notification can produce public safety benefits. In reducing sexual recidivism, Minnesota's tiered risk management system adheres to the risk principle by concentrating notification resources on the highest risk offenders.…”
Section: Circles Of Support and Accountability In Minnesotamentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Such policies are debated regarding their efficacy (Tewksbury & Jennings, 2010;Zgoba, Veysey, & Dalessandro, 2010), and their effects on offenders (Levenson & Cotter, 2005;Levenson, Zgoba, & Tewksbury, 2007;Tewksbury, 2004Tewksbury, , 2005Tewksbury & Lees, 2007;Tewksbury & Mustaine, 2007) and communities (Barnes, Dukes, Tewksbury, & De Troye, 2009;Tewksbury & Jennings, 2010). However, despite research assessing the consequences of such policies, there is surprisingly little research addressing people's attitudes toward these policies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%