An Analysis of the Dynamics of Ownership, Capacity Investments and Pricing Structure of Ports

Abstract

With more than 80% of the world's cargoes being transported by sea, effective port management is critical to the well-being of the global economy. This study models the effects of port ownership and governance on capacity investment and pricing structure, and these changes' implications on port service level and social welfare. The study argues that capacity investment and pricing are significantly influenced by a port's ownership form, and the different levels of government involved. Inter-port competition leads to increased capacity investments by private investors and local authorities, which can be either higher or lower than social optimal level. Therefore, it is important for policymakers to consider the effects of institutional and competition factors in port reform initiatives.

Game Theory and Port Economics: A Survey of Recent Research

“…Xiao et al . () and Czerny et al . () find that private owned ports set higher port charges than public owned ones.…”

“…Finally, Xiao et al . () add reducing bureaucracy and public investment as other reasons for devolution. However, does devolution actually have these effects?…”

“…To do so, Xiao et al . () propose an integrated economic model in which the effects of different forms of ownership on port charges and capacity investment are analyzed. Moreover, these authors consider the case of either monopoly or oligopoly.…”

Port investments on coastal and marine disasters prevention: Economic modeling and implications

“…However, the responsibilities for investing disaster prevention are usually not clearly (if at all) specified in concession agreements. The investment responsibilities among port stakeholders in paying the (substantial) investment bills are usually not clearly defined, not helped by the substantial uncertainties associated with the likelihood and severity of the occurrence of such disasters (notably with the impacts of climate change), and the increasing complexity in the port community following the wave of neoliberal management reforms over the past decades (Martin and Thomas, 2001;Xiao et al, 2012;Ng et al, 2013). Unsurprisingly, this sometimes leads to finger pointing between the port authority and its tenants (e.g., terminal operators, owners of other businesses on port land such as warehouse keepers, logistics service providers, owners of commercial facilities such as hotels, car parks and shipyards).…”

Institutions and the governance of transport infrastructure projects: Some insight from the planning and construction of the CentrePort Canada Way

“…With the global division of labors, the diversification of the process production to different countries and regions, global supply chains have gradually transformed the pivotal roles of ports (not just seaports, but any nodal facilities which can facilitate the smooth production, and the efficient distribution, of products around the world, including inland ports, river ports, and even airports) in connecting global productions and economies (Ng & Liu, 2014;Xiao, Ng, Yang, & Fu, 2012). As most cargo flows are constrained by geographic distances (Guerrero, 2014), niche markets and local economies would be given the opportunity to connect to the global economy only with the existence of ports and other logistical nodes.…”