The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis of the driving forces behind pollutant emission reduction in Chinese industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the outbreak of COVID-19, emission reduction of industry and traffic mobility were the two major reasons reducing air pollution [ 19 ]. It has been confirmed that the emission of the industry has a close relationship with the secondary industrial output values (SIOV, i.e., the gross product of secondary industry of each city) [ 22 , 34 , 35 ]. Therefore, for indicating the decrease of PM concentration caused by the reduction of industrial operation, decline rates of the secondary industrial output values (drSIOV) in the first quarter in 2020 (compared with the first quarter in 2019) of prefectural cities were obtained from the socio-economic operation bulletins.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the outbreak of COVID-19, emission reduction of industry and traffic mobility were the two major reasons reducing air pollution [ 19 ]. It has been confirmed that the emission of the industry has a close relationship with the secondary industrial output values (SIOV, i.e., the gross product of secondary industry of each city) [ 22 , 34 , 35 ]. Therefore, for indicating the decrease of PM concentration caused by the reduction of industrial operation, decline rates of the secondary industrial output values (drSIOV) in the first quarter in 2020 (compared with the first quarter in 2019) of prefectural cities were obtained from the socio-economic operation bulletins.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies of Dasgupta et al (2002), Stern (2004), Dinda (2004), Brock and Taylor (2005), Carson (2010), Chowdhury and Moran (2012) and de Ribeiro and Kruglianskas, 2015 among others, provide extensive review surveys of the literature which tested the economic growth-environmental pollution nexus and the EKC hypothesis. There is an increasing progress of researches on air or water pollution, deforestation, diversity and indicators of environmental amenities up until for some recent findings around the world (e. g. Kaika and Zervas, 2013;Katz, 2015;Wang et al, 2015Wang et al, , 2016a, also in China (e. g. Xu and Lin, 2015;Yao et al, 2016;Hao and Liu, 2016;Wang et al, 2016b). However, researches on the relationship between agriculture-related pollution and economic growth are relatively scanty (Shortle and Abler, 2001;Aftab et al, 2010), few of which were related to Environmental Kuznets Curve.…”
Section: Environmental Kuznets Curvementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The census assessed the basic situation of enterprises, main pollutants generated, and those discharged after end‐of‐pipe treatment for different kinds of pollution sources. Data on emission levels, main pollutants, and operating conditions of pollution control facilities were comprehensively investigated [ Yao et al ., ]. In this study, we choose the chemical oxygen demand (COD) and ammoniacal nitrogen (NH 3 ‐N) as proxies of water quality.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%