1965
DOI: 10.1177/001316446502500304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Analysis of Test-Wiseness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
137
0
9

Year Published

1977
1977
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 236 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
137
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…3) or the MT21 test. 4 One important formal difference between the approaches must be noted: whereas most of the MT21 and Michigan group items have a multiple choice format (a point critically discussed within both projects, see Blö-meke, Kaiser & Lehmann, 2008;Schilling & Hill, 2007), all PCK and CK items in the COACTIV study have an open-ended format, thus avoiding the problems typically associated with multiple choice items (e.g., guessing ;Millman, Bishop, & Ebel, 1965 For several of the subsequent analyses, these 198 teachers were split into two groups. The rationale for this distinction lies in the structure of the German secondary school system.…”
Section: The Mt21 Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) or the MT21 test. 4 One important formal difference between the approaches must be noted: whereas most of the MT21 and Michigan group items have a multiple choice format (a point critically discussed within both projects, see Blö-meke, Kaiser & Lehmann, 2008;Schilling & Hill, 2007), all PCK and CK items in the COACTIV study have an open-ended format, thus avoiding the problems typically associated with multiple choice items (e.g., guessing ;Millman, Bishop, & Ebel, 1965 For several of the subsequent analyses, these 198 teachers were split into two groups. The rationale for this distinction lies in the structure of the German secondary school system.…”
Section: The Mt21 Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Test-wiseness is largely independent of the subject matter for which the items are supposed to measure (Millman, Bishop & Ebel, 1965). In other words, TW is the ability to use special strategies to select the correct response in multiple choice tests, without necessarily knowing the content or skill that is being measured.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] As such, they have long been favored as a means of assessing individuals in a variety of domains, ranging from academic settings to professional certification processes, as well as in everyday life, such as obtaining a driver's license. [4][5][6] Despite their popularity, these tests provoke much debate over whether they can truly examine application of knowledge, particularly in a clinical field such as pharmacy 7 or medicine. 8 Testwiseness has been defined by Gibb as ''.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in many other academic settings and in other walks of life, multiplechoice tests may be an important factor in advancement or promotion. 6 Within pharmacy education, there has been no work reported on the prevalence or impact of testwiseness. Since pharmacy students were generally among the most academically successful students in postsecondary education, it is reasonable to assume they have acquired some degree of testwiseness during their education.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%