2001
DOI: 10.1002/asmb.442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis of Taguchi's on‐line quality monitoring procedure for attributes with diagnosis errors

Abstract: SUMMARYThe on-line quality monitoring procedure for attributes proposed by Taguchi, Elsayed and Hsiang for processes in which the fraction defective shifts from 0 at some point are examined under the assumption of diagnosis errors. The renewal reward (economic) approach of Nayebpour and Woodall is used to develop a mathematical expression for the long-run expected cost per item produced and assessment of the optimum inspection interval is discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
24
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, the process is in-control at the i-th inspection, and it also stays in-control at the (i + 1)-th inspection. The non-null elements of the matrix A 00 are expressed in (2).…”
Section: An Analysis Of Taguchi's On-line Quality Monitoring Procedurmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, the process is in-control at the i-th inspection, and it also stays in-control at the (i + 1)-th inspection. The non-null elements of the matrix A 00 are expressed in (2).…”
Section: An Analysis Of Taguchi's On-line Quality Monitoring Procedurmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although in the development of the Bayesian estimation methodology, we have assumed that the inspection error is negligible, this may not be the case in all situations. Borges, Ho, and Turnes (2001) developed an extension of the problem in the presence of diagnostic errors. As they showed, extension of the results of Nayebpour and Woodall (1993) requires the development of a new model.…”
Section: Effect Of Sample Size (N)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal monitoring procedures are more sensitive to changes in type I error than to changes in type II error. But Borges et al (2001) assumed that p and π are known. Here we show how the presence of type I and type II inspection errors affect the estimation of p and π and thus the optimal monitoring procedure.…”
Section: Effect Of Sample Size (N)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As probabilidades restantes, P (1,1), (2,1) , P (1,1),(2,0) , P (2,1),(2,1) e P (2,1), (2,0) , devem considerar apenas a probabilidade de julgar o item inspecionado conforme ou não conforme, pois o ciclo já se inicia no estado de produção II. (1 ) P P y P P − = + .…”
Section: Modelo Probabilísticounclassified
“…No modelo de controle para atributos apresentado por Borges et al (2001) admite-se que o sistema de inspeção está sujeito a erros de classificação. Pode-se julgar um item conforme dado que ele não o é (erro tipo II) ou julgar um item conforme como não conforme (erro tipo I).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified