2010
DOI: 10.1007/s12221-010-0877-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis of structure and properties of a natural cellulosic fiber (Leafiran)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
5
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The samples were thereafter placed in humidity chamber at 65% RH at 21 °C for 24 h [29,30]. To obtain statistically significant number of samples, three repetitions were carried out for each test and twenty fibers samples were randomly selected for each test.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The samples were thereafter placed in humidity chamber at 65% RH at 21 °C for 24 h [29,30]. To obtain statistically significant number of samples, three repetitions were carried out for each test and twenty fibers samples were randomly selected for each test.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These characteristic bands are also present in hemicellulose. The presence of a vibration at 1724 cm -1 , being characteristic for unconjugated carbonyl groups (C=O) 25 , is representative for hemicellulose, as well as a band at 1246 cm -1 , which is associated to the acetyl group 24 . The typical C-H and O-H stretching vibrations are also present in lignin.…”
Section: Ir Region (Cm -1 )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, for fibers treated with NaOH and Ca(OH) 2 , the lignin and hemicellulose peaks were not observed, and this is especially true for any fiber treated with NaOH. Hence, removing surface components with alkali allowed the fiber to soak up an even larger volume of moisture on account of the exposure of OH groups belonging to the cellulose, making the alkali treated fiber more hydrophilic 25 .…”
Section: Microscopic Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The salient drawbacks with natural fibers when commingled in composites is their relatively high moisture absorption tendency and poor compatibility with the matrix (Gupta et al, 2016;Venkateshwaran et al, 2011). These negative characteristics are primarily due to their inherent heterogenous content such as carbohydrates (cellulose, hemicellulose, starch), lignin, pectin, waxes, fats and other polar compounds (Mortazavi & Moghaddam, 2010;Sun & Cheng, 2002). Thus, weak interface adhesion between natural fibers and polymer matrices are due to the differences in the wettability of natural fibers (inherently hydrophilic) and the polymer matrix (usually hydrophobic).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%