“…A number of investigators, using questionnaires and inventories, have found that good students can be distinguished from poor achievers on the basis of specific study methods used, although not all findings agree on which methods characterize which group (68,120,183,228,300,304). It should be stated that in three of the studies mentioned (68,120,300) no account was taken of intelligence. Wrenn (320) has evolved a self-rating study-habits inventory which he found to distinguish sharply between students of high and low scholarship at Stanford, with intelligence equated.…”